From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/18] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5810E04D.9020300@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026145207.GM3334@pc.thejh.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 640 bytes --]
On 26/10/2016 16:52, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> The loaded Landlock eBPF programs can be triggered by a seccomp filter
>> returning RET_LANDLOCK. In addition, a cookie (16-bit value) can be passed from
>> a seccomp filter to eBPF programs. This allow flexible security policies
>> between seccomp and Landlock.
>
> Is this still up to date, or was that removed in v3?
>
I forgot to remove this part. In this v4 series, as describe in the
(small) patch 11/18, a Landlock rule cannot be triggered by a seccomp
filter. So there is no more RET_LANDLOCK nor cookie.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 6:56 [RFC v4 00/18] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 01/18] landlock: Add Kconfig Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 02/18] bpf: Move u64_to_ptr() to BPF headers and inline it Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 7:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 13:52 ` [kernel-hardening] " David Sterba
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 03/18] bpf,landlock: Add a new arraymap type to deal with (Landlock) handles Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 19:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Jann Horn
2016-10-26 20:03 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 20:16 ` Jann Horn
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 04/18] bpf,landlock: Add eBPF program subtype and is_valid_subtype() verifier Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 05/18] bpf,landlock: Define an eBPF program type for Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 06/18] fs: Constify path_is_under()'s arguments Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 07/18] landlock: Add LSM hooks Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 08/18] landlock: Handle file comparisons Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 09/18] landlock: Add manager functions Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 10/18] seccomp: Split put_seccomp_filter() with put_seccomp() Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 11/18] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per process hierarchy Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 12/18] bpf: Cosmetic change for bpf_prog_attach() Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 13/18] bpf/cgroup: Replace struct bpf_prog with struct bpf_object Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 14/18] bpf/cgroup: Make cgroup_bpf_update() return an error code Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 15/18] bpf/cgroup: Move capability check Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 16/18] bpf/cgroup,landlock: Handle Landlock hooks per cgroup Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 17/18] landlock: Add update and debug access flags Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 6:56 ` [RFC v4 18/18] samples/landlock: Add sandbox example Mickaël Salaün
2016-10-26 14:52 ` [RFC v4 00/18] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing Jann Horn
2016-10-26 16:56 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2016-10-26 17:24 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-11-13 14:23 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-11-14 10:35 ` Sargun Dhillon
2016-11-14 20:51 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-11-13 17:38 Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5810E04D.9020300@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).