From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755592AbcKKKfM (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:35:12 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:33533 "EHLO mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754518AbcKKKfJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:35:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] drivers: soc: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver To: John Garry , Arnd Bergmann References: <1478101374-18778-1-git-send-email-anurup.m@huawei.com> <2467231.EbVekJun1R@wuerfel> <2030692.HPgjBCTYG6@wuerfel> <5821F491.1010603@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, anurup.m@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, shyju.pv@huawei.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, sanil.kumar@hisilicon.com, tanxiaojun@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com From: Anurup M Message-ID: <58259ED6.30609@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:05:02 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 09 November 2016 02:36 PM, John Garry wrote: > >>>>> I'd suggest requiring #address-cells=<1> and #size-cells=<0> in the >>>>> master >>>>> node, and listing the children by reg property. If the address is not >>>>> easily expressed as a single integer, use a larger #address-cells >>>>> value. >>>> We already have something equivalent to reg in "module-id" (see patch >>>> 02/11), which is the slave device bus address; here's a sample: >>>> + /* For L3 cache PMU */ >>>> + pmul3c0 { >>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-pmu-l3c-v1"; >>>> + scl-id = <0x02>; >>>> + num-events = <0x16>; >>>> + num-counters = <0x08>; >>>> + module-id = <0x04>; >>>> + num-banks = <0x04>; >>>> + cfgen-map = <0x02 0x04 0x01 0x08>; >>>> + counter-reg = <0x170>; >>>> + evctrl-reg = <0x04>; >>>> + event-en = <0x1000000>; >>>> + evtype-reg = <0x140>; >>>> + }; >>>> >>>> FYI, "module-id" is our own internal hw nomenclature. >>> Yes, that was my interpretation as well. Please use the standard >>> "reg" property for this then. >> Hi Arnd, >> >> Firstly my apologies for a mistake in the bindings example in ([PATCH >> 02/11 ..]). >> The module-id property is a list as defined in the PMU bindings patch >> ([PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings .. ). >> >> + djtag0: djtag@0 { >> + compatible = "hisilicon,hip05-cpu-djtag-v1"; >> + pmul3c0 { >> + compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-pmu-l3c-v1"; >> + scl-id = <0x02>; >> + num-events = <0x16>; >> + num-counters = <0x08>; >> + module-id = <0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04>; >> + num-banks = <0x04>; >> + cfgen-map = <0x02 0x04 0x01 0x08>; >> + counter-reg = <0x170>; >> + evctrl-reg = <0x04>; >> + event-en = <0x1000000>; >> + evtype-reg = <0x140>; >> + }; >> >> >> The L3 cache in hip05/06/07 chips consist of 4 banks (each bank has PMU >> registers). >> >> In hip05/06 all L3 cache banks are identified with same module-id. >> module-id = <0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04>; >> >> But in the case hip07 chip(djtag v2), each L3 cache bank has different >> module-id >> module-id = <0x01 0x02 0x03 0x04>; >> >> So in this case Please share your opinion on how to model it. >> > > My suggestion is to have a single PMU per module, whether that is 4 > banks or 1 bank per module, as this makes the driver simpler. > > I think you mentioned that a separate PMU per bank does not make much > sense, and you would rather treat all banks as a single bank and > aggregrate their perf statstics under a single PMU: Can you just use a > script in userspace which can do this aggregration work if you have > separate PMUs? Hi John, Mark also suggest the same view. I have some concerns or doubts in having separate PMU for each L3 cache bank. We can discuss it in the same thread [[RESEND PATCH v1 07/11]] ]. Thanks, Anurup > > Maybe perf guys have a view on this also. > > John > >> Some more detail of L3 cache PMU. >> ------------------------------------------------ >> The hip05/06/07 chips consists of a multiple Super CPU cluster (16 CPU >> cores). we call it SCCL. >> The L3 cache( 4 banks) is shared by all CPU cores in a SCCL. >> Each L3 cache bank has PMU registers. We always take the sum of the >> counters to show in perf. >> Taking individual L3 cache count is not meaningful as there is no >> mapping of CPU cores to individual >> L3 cache banks. >> >> Please share your suggestion. >> >> Thanks, >> Anurup >