From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
pombredanne@nexb.com, stummala@codeaurora.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, guro@fb.com,
mka@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, longman@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, shakeelb@google.com, jbacik@fb.com,
linux@roeck-us.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:09:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5828e99c-74d2-6208-5ec2-3361899dd36a@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327091504.zcqvr3mkuznlgwux@esperanza>
On 27.03.2018 12:15, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:09:35PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> Hi, Vladimir,
>>
>> thanks for your review!
>>
>> On 24.03.2018 21:40, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>> Hello Kirill,
>>>
>>> I don't have any objections to the idea behind this patch set.
>>> Well, at least I don't know how to better tackle the problem you
>>> describe in the cover letter. Please, see below for my comments
>>> regarding implementation details.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:21:17PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>>> The patch introduces shrinker::id number, which is used to enumerate
>>>> memcg-aware shrinkers. The number start from 0, and the code tries
>>>> to maintain it as small as possible.
>>>>
>>>> This will be used as to represent a memcg-aware shrinkers in memcg
>>>> shrinkers map.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/shrinker.h | 1 +
>>>> mm/vmscan.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
>>>> index a3894918a436..738de8ef5246 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct shrinker {
>>>>
>>>> /* These are for internal use */
>>>> struct list_head list;
>>>> + int id;
>>>
>>> This definition could definitely use a comment.
>>>
>>> BTW shouldn't we ifdef it?
>>
>> Ok
>>
>>>> /* objs pending delete, per node */
>>>> atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> index 8fcd9f8d7390..91b5120b924f 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>>> @@ -159,6 +159,56 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
>>>> static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
>>>> static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>>>>
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB)
>>>> +static DEFINE_IDA(bitmap_id_ida);
>>>> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(bitmap_rwsem);
>>>
>>> Can't we reuse shrinker_rwsem for protecting the ida?
>>
>> I think it won't be better, since we allocate memory under this semaphore.
>> After we use shrinker_rwsem, we'll have to allocate the memory with GFP_ATOMIC,
>> which does not seems good. Currently, the patchset makes shrinker_rwsem be taken
>> for a small time, just to assign already allocated memory to maps.
>
> AFAIR it's OK to sleep under an rwsem so GFP_ATOMIC wouldn't be
> necessary. Anyway, we only need to allocate memory when we extend
> shrinker bitmaps, which is rare. In fact, there can only be a limited
> number of such calls, as we never shrink these bitmaps (which is fine
> by me).
We take bitmap_rwsem for writing to expand shrinkers maps. If we replace
it with shrinker_rwsem and the memory allocation get into reclaim, there
will be deadlock.
>>
>>>> +static int bitmap_id_start;
>>>> +
>>>> +static int alloc_shrinker_id(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int id, ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +retry:
>>>> + ida_pre_get(&bitmap_id_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + down_write(&bitmap_rwsem);
>>>> + ret = ida_get_new_above(&bitmap_id_ida, bitmap_id_start, &id);
>>>
>>> AFAIK ida always allocates the smallest available id so you don't need
>>> to keep track of bitmap_id_start.
>>
>> I saw mnt_alloc_group_id() does the same, so this was the reason, the additional
>> variable was used. Doesn't this gives a good advise to ida and makes it find
>> a free id faster?
>
> As Matthew pointed out, this is rather pointless.
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-21 13:21 [PATCH 00/10] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:40 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:09 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-26 15:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-26 15:38 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-27 9:15 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:09 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2018-03-27 15:48 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-28 10:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-28 11:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: Maintain memcg-aware shrinkers in mcg_shrinkers array Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:45 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:20 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-26 15:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-27 9:18 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 14:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 15:12 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 15:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 15:43 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 16:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-21 16:42 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-22 16:39 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-23 9:06 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-23 11:26 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:29 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-27 10:00 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-27 15:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: Propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 18:50 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:29 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] list_lru: Add memcg argument to list_lru_from_kmem() Kirill Tkhai
2018-04-02 3:17 ` [lkp-robot] [list_lru] 42658d54ce: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2018-04-02 8:51 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] list_lru: Pass dst_memcg argument to memcg_drain_list_lru_node() Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:32 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-28 14:49 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] list_lru: Pass lru " Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: Set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item apearance Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 19:45 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: Iterate only over charged shrinkers during memcg shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 20:11 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:33 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: Clear shrinker bit if there are no objects related to memcg Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-24 20:33 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-03-26 15:37 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 00/10] Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n)) Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5828e99c-74d2-6208-5ec2-3361899dd36a@virtuozzo.com \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).