From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S939026AbcKOFEd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:04:33 -0500
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:28872 "EHLO
        szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932337AbcKOFEb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:04:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] perf clang: Builtin clang and perfhook support
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
References: <CAADnVQLG9OcJh63rUN0JcgcfB1cCj6riFJBPwZoWe0V-u9bh6g@mail.gmail.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <582A972A.1010304@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:03:38 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLG9OcJh63rUN0JcgcfB1cCj6riFJBPwZoWe0V-u9bh6g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.111.66.109]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 2016/11/15 12:57, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> wrote:
>> This is version 2 of perf builtin clang patch series. Compare to v1,
>> add an exciting feature: jit compiling perf hook functions. This
>> features allows script writer report result through BPF map in a
>> customized way.
> looks great.
>
>>    SEC("perfhook:record_start")
>>    void record_start(void *ctx)
>>    {
>>          int perf_pid = getpid(), key = G_perf_pid;
>>          printf("Start count, perfpid=%d\n", perf_pid);
>>          jit_helper__map_update_elem(ctx, &GVALS, &key, &perf_pid, 0);
> the name, I think, is too verbose.
> Why not to keep them as bpf_map_update_elem
> even for user space programs?

I can make it shorter by give it a better name or use a wrapper like

BPF_MAP(update_elem)

but the only thing I can't do is to make perfhook and in-kernel script
use a uniform name for these bpf_map functions, because
bpf_map_update_elem is already defined:

"static long (*bpf_map_update_elem)(void *, void *, void *, unsigned 
long) = (void *)2;\n"


>>    SEC("perfhook:record_end")
>>    void record_end(void *ctx)
>>    {
>>          u64 key = -1, value;
>>          while (!jit_helper__map_get_next_key(ctx, &syscall_counter, &key, &key)) {
>>                  jit_helper__map_lookup_elem(ctx, &syscall_counter, &key, &value);
>>                  printf("syscall %ld\tcount: %ld\n", (long)key, (long)value);
> this loop will be less verbose as well.