From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, luto@amacapital.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
a.darwish@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bigeasy@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] x86/hw_breakpoint: Prevent data breakpoints on direct GDT
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 13:45:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <582d9136-8f8b-fa07-862e-9ea5d440c09f@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529213320.840953950@infradead.org>
On 29/05/2020 22:27, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> A data breakpoint on the GDT is terrifying and should be avoided.
> The GDT on CPU entry area is already protected. The direct GDT
> should be also protected, although it is seldom used and only
> used for short time.
While I agree with the sentiment...
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200526014221.2119-3-laijs@linux.alibaba.com
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/debugreg.h>
> #include <asm/user.h>
> +#include <asm/desc.h>
>
> /* Per cpu debug control register value */
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_dr7);
> @@ -237,13 +238,26 @@ static inline bool within_area(unsigned
> }
>
> /*
> - * Checks whether the range from addr to end, inclusive, overlaps the CPU
> - * entry area range.
> + * Checks whether the range from addr to end, inclusive, overlaps the fixed
> + * mapped CPU entry area range or other ranges used for CPU entry.
> */
> -static inline bool within_cpu_entry_area(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +static inline bool within_cpu_entry(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> {
> - return within_area(addr, end, CPU_ENTRY_AREA_BASE,
> - CPU_ENTRY_AREA_TOTAL_SIZE);
> + int cpu;
> +
> + /* CPU entry erea is always used for CPU entry */
> + if (within_area(addr, end, CPU_ENTRY_AREA_BASE,
> + CPU_ENTRY_AREA_TOTAL_SIZE))
> + return true;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + /* The original rw GDT is being used after load_direct_gdt() */
> + if (within_area(addr, end, (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu),
> + GDT_SIZE))
... why the O(n) loop over the system?
It is only GDTs which might ever be active on this local CPU(/thread)
which are a problem, because the breakpoint registers are similarly local.
Nothing is going to go wrong If I put a breakpoint on someone else's
live GDT, because they wont interact in the "fun" ways we're trying to
avoid.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-30 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 21:27 [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86/hw_breakpoint: Add within_area() to check data breakpoints Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 02/14] x86/hw_breakpoint: Prevent data breakpoints on direct GDT Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 12:45 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-05-30 15:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 03/14] x86/hw_breakpoint: Prevent data breakpoints on per_cpu cpu_tss_rw Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86/hw_breakpoint: Prevent data breakpoints on user_pcid_flush_mask Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 05/14] x86/entry: Introduce local_db_{save,restore}() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86/entry, nmi: Disable #DB Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 07/14] x86/entry, mce: Disallow #DB during #MC Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 08/14] x86/entry: Optimize local_db_save() for virt Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-03 1:17 ` [PATCH 08/14] " Sean Christopherson
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 09/14] x86/entry: Remove debug IDT frobbing Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 10/14] x86/entry: Remove DBn stacks Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 11/14] x86/entry: Clarify irq_{enter,exit}_rcu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-02 14:42 ` [PATCH 11/14] " Qian Cai
2020-06-02 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-02 18:47 ` Qian Cai
2020-06-03 17:50 ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Use __irq_exit_rcu() in irq_exit() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 12/14] x86/entry: Rename trace_hardirqs_off_prepare() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-30 9:57 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 13/14] lockdep: Prepare for NMI IRQ state tracking Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 22:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-29 22:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-29 22:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-02 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-29 21:27 ` [PATCH 14/14] x86/entry: Fix NMI vs " Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=582d9136-8f8b-fa07-862e-9ea5d440c09f@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).