From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <583191c1-4153-cee8-1836-a4037b9ea304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203182500.GD16798@blackbody.suse.cz>
On 12/3/21 13:25, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello Longman.
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 08:28:09PM -0500, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 1) The limitation that "cpuset.cpus" has to be a superset of child's
>> "cpuset.cpus" has been removed as a new patch to remove that limitation will
>> be added.
> Superb!
>
>> 2) The initial transition from "member" to partition root now requires that
>> "cpuset.cpus" overlap with that of the parent's "cpuset.cpus" instead of
>> being a superset.
> That's sensible.
>
>> For the transition back to "member", I haven't changed the current wording
>> of forcing child partition roots to become "member" yet. If you think
>> keeping them as invalid partition root is better, I can made that change
>> too.
> I wrote I was indifferent about this in a previous mail but when I think
> about it now, switching to invalid root is perhaps better than switching
> to member since it'd effectively mean that modifications of the parent
> config propagate (permanently) also to a descendant config, which is
> an undesired v1-ism.
That makes sense. I will keep those child partitions in an invalid state
then.
>
>> Please let me know what other changes you would like to see.
> I hope my remarks below are just clarifications and not substantial
> changes. Besides that I find your new draft good. Thanks!
>
>> [...]
>> An invalid partition root can be reverted back to a valid one
>> if none of the validity constraints of a valid partition root
>> are violated.
> s/can be/will be/
>
> (I understand the intention is to make it asynchronously and
> automatically, i.e. without writing into the affected descendant(s)
> cpuset.partition again.)
Yes, that will be automatic and the partition will become valid again if
other events cause changes that unbreak the validity constraints.
>
>> Poll and inotify events are triggered whenever the state of
>> "cpuset.cpus.partition" changes. That includes changes caused by
>> write to "cpuset.cpus.partition", cpu hotplug and other changes
>> that make the partition invalid.
> -> that change validity status
>
> (In accordance with the comment above.)
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 14:36 [PATCH v8 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Add new cpuset partition type & empty effecitve cpus Waiman Long
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have empty cpuset.cpus.effective Waiman Long
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Refining features and constraints of a partition Waiman Long
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type Waiman Long
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Show invalid partition reason string Waiman Long
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst Waiman Long
2021-11-15 19:31 ` Michal Koutný
2021-11-15 20:11 ` Tejun Heo
2021-11-15 21:27 ` Waiman Long
2021-11-15 21:10 ` Waiman Long
2021-11-16 17:54 ` Michal Koutný
2021-11-30 15:35 ` Waiman Long
2021-11-30 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-01 3:56 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-01 14:13 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-01 14:56 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-01 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-01 17:49 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-01 14:26 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-01 16:46 ` Tejun Heo
2021-12-01 18:05 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-02 1:28 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-03 18:25 ` Michal Koutný
2021-12-03 19:27 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-10-18 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] kselftest/cgroup: Add cpuset v2 partition root state test Waiman Long
2021-10-27 23:05 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Add new cpuset partition type & empty effecitve cpus Waiman Long
2021-11-10 11:13 ` Felix Moessbauer
2021-11-10 13:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-10 13:56 ` Michal Koutný
2021-11-10 15:21 ` Moessbauer, Felix
2021-11-10 16:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-10 16:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-10 16:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2021-11-10 17:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-11-10 18:30 ` Waiman Long
2021-11-10 17:52 ` Michal Koutný
2021-11-10 18:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2021-11-10 18:15 ` Michal Koutný
2021-11-10 15:20 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=583191c1-4153-cee8-1836-a4037b9ea304@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).