From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Douglas Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
Aleksandr Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] regulator: pwm: DT: Add ramp delay for exponential voltage transition
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:20:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <583406CC.9080306@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161121161727.y6pvydowiyeyy7qs@rob-hp-laptop>
On Monday 21 November 2016 09:47 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:05:55PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Some PWM regulator has the exponential transition in voltage change as
>> opposite to fixed slew-rate linear transition on other regulators.
>> For such PWM regulators, add the property to tell that voltage change
>> is exponential and having fixed delay for any level of change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>> CC: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> CC: Aleksandr Frid <afrid@nvidia.com>
>>
>> ---
>> This patch is continuation of discussion on patch
>> regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9216857/
>> where is it discussed to have separate property for PWM which has
>> exponential voltage transition.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>> - Pass the flag to tell that voltage ramp is exponential instead of
>> providing delay.
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt
>> index 3aeba9f..2d9ef3a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt
>> @@ -54,6 +54,18 @@ Optional properties:
>> --------------------
>> - enable-gpios: GPIO to use to enable/disable the regulator
>>
>> +- voltage-ramp-exponential: Boolean, Some of PWM regulator has the exponential
>> + transition in voltage ramp as opposite to fixed
>> + slew-rate linear transition on other regulators.
>> + For such PWM regulator, presence of this property will
>> + tell that value of the regulator ramp delay provided by
>> + DT property "regulator-ramp-delay" is exponential and
>> + fixed delay for any voltage level change.
>> + If PWM regulator supports the fixed linear slew rate
>> + then this property should be absent from DT node and
>> + property "regulator-ramp-delay" is used as linear slew
>> + rate.
> Sorry, but on further thought, I don't think we should mix different
> units for the same property. Also, the fact that the ramp is exponential
> is irrelevant. You just want an absolute delay time rather than a rate,
> right? So instead, how about just "regulator-ramp-time-us". Roughly what
> you had in v1, but not PWM specific.
Can we say "regulator-settling-time-us" and make it generic i.e. part of
the regulator core instead of PWM regulator specific?
So no change for "regulator-ramp-delay".
new property "regulator-settling-time-us" for fixed settling time in any
voltage level change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-18 14:35 [PATCH V2 1/2] regulator: pwm: DT: Add ramp delay for exponential voltage transition Laxman Dewangan
2016-11-18 14:35 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] regulator: pwm: " Laxman Dewangan
2016-11-21 16:17 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] regulator: pwm: DT: " Rob Herring
2016-11-22 8:50 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2016-11-22 21:13 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=583406CC.9080306@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=afrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).