From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Avoid race between dwc3 interrupt handler and irq thread handler
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 12:45:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5861F1D6.5040208@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4kuJEdBxcZPRrv7-YV7jpZFtajY9j9G24iWDmiMp-t0+fAw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 12/27/2016 10:58 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 December 2016 at 10:39, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/26/2016 04:01 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> On some platfroms(like x86 platform), when one core is running the USB gadget
>>> irq thread handler by dwc3_thread_interrupt(), meanwhile another core also can
>>> respond other interrupts from dwc3 controller and modify the event buffer by
>>> dwc3_interrupt() function, that will cause getting the wrong event count in
>>> irq thread handler to make the USB function abnormal.
>>>
>>> We should add spin_lock/unlock() in dwc3_check_event_buf() to avoid this race.
>> Why not spin_lock_irq ones? This lock seems to be used in both
>> normal and interrupt threads. Or, I missed anything?
> I assumed there are no nested interrupts, when one core is running at
> interrupt context, then it can not respond any other interrupts, which
> means we don't need to disable local IRQ now, right?
>
Fair enough. Thanks.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-27 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-26 8:01 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Avoid race between dwc3 interrupt handler and irq thread handler Baolin Wang
2016-12-27 2:39 ` Lu Baolu
2016-12-27 2:58 ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-27 4:45 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2016-12-27 11:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-12-28 15:27 ` Janusz Dziedzic
2016-12-28 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-12-29 1:29 ` John Youn
2017-01-05 19:08 ` John Youn
2017-01-06 2:44 ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-27 10:52 ` Janusz Dziedzic
2016-12-27 11:06 ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-27 11:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-12-27 12:16 ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-28 12:30 ` Janusz Dziedzic
2017-01-03 12:21 ` Baolin Wang
2017-01-03 12:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-05 2:07 ` Baolin Wang
2017-01-05 9:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-05 9:43 ` Baolin Wang
2017-01-05 11:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-05 12:03 ` Baolin Wang
2016-12-27 11:07 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5861F1D6.5040208@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).