From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751099AbdAPJyV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:54:21 -0500
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:3724 "EHLO
        szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750942AbdAPJyU (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:54:20 -0500
Message-ID: <587C980C.3090300@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:53:16 +0800
From: zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
        <peterz@infradead.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        <eranian@google.com>, <kan.liang@intel.com>, <davidcc@google.com>,
        <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <qiaonuohan@huawei.com>,
        <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix race caused by hyperthreads when online an offline
 cpu
References: <1484536871-3131-1-git-send-email-zhouchengming1@huawei.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161003200.3877@nanos>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161003200.3877@nanos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.177.236.183]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
        refid=str=0001.0A090201.587C9838.004A,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
        ip=0.0.0.0,
        so=2013-06-18 04:22:30,
        dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: fc15e5a89f2a14a074770d1138fa5bdc
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2017/1/16 17:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Zhou Chengming wrote:
>
> Can you please stop sending the same patch over and over every other day?
>
> Granted, things get forgotten, but sending a polite reminder after a week
> is definitely enough.
>
> Maintainers are not machines responding within a split second on every mail
> they get. And that patch is not so substantial that it justifies that kind
> of spam.
>

Very sorry for the noise. We are just not sure this is the right fix because it's
hard to reproduce.

Thanks.

> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
>
>
>
> .
>