From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751151AbdAPOpZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:45:25 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:56614 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817AbdAPOpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 09:45:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver To: Marc Zyngier , Agustin Vega-Frias , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1481753438-3905-1-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org> <16e3b40407e8072dd5b15bf7e65afb18@codeaurora.org> <266105963441d1cdddeaf40c4b78c239@codeaurora.org> <8587b5ab-59b1-feb7-09d9-7ade6d433a4c@arm.com> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "ACPI Devel Maling List" , , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Timur Tabi , "Christopher Covington" , Andy Gross , , Jon Masters , Mark Salter , Mark Langsdorf , Al Stone , , Graeme Gregory , Charles Garcia Tobin , From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <587CDB96.9000906@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:41:26 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8587b5ab-59b1-feb7-09d9-7ade6d433a4c@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.17.188] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.587CDB9E.0270,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: e257184f22ca3b58136b76f9c6a73247 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2017/1/16 22:14, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 16/01/17 14:07, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 2017-01-03 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Is there any more feedback on this beyond Lorenzo's suggestion to drop >>>> the conditional check on the first patch? >>>> How can we move forward on this series? >>> Essentially, I need to convince myself that patches [1-2/3] are fine >>> which hasn't happened yet. >> Pinging again. Do you have any questions that might help with your >> review? I have some minor changes I have to make to the driver itself >> (patch 3) and I'd like to submit any changes you might want along with >> those. > I'd like to add that these two initial patches are now a prerequisite > for Hanjun's series, so it'd be good to have an idea of where we're > going on that front. Is it helpful to test patch [1-2/3] on x86 machines (with different firmware) and an IA64 machine (surely a different version of firmware :) ) with Lorenzo's suggestion of removing #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI for is_gsi()? If yes, I can do that as I have such machines. Thanks Hanjun