From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S941363AbdDTFNl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:13:41 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:35013 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S941346AbdDTFNk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:13:40 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: introduce event tracepoints for dynamic device_node
 lifecyle
To: Tyrel Datwyler <turtle.in.the.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org
References: <1492475525-10827-1-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <58F6AA35.2040902@gmail.com> <87efwp6v4e.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
 <1d51a229-612b-bf09-93d5-6e43b476e2cf@gmail.com> <58F83C66.7030806@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <58F84369.3080304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:13:13 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <58F83C66.7030806@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/19/17 21:43, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 04/19/17 16:27, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> On 04/18/2017 06:31 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:

< snip >

>>
>> To get that same info as far as I know is to add a dump_stack() after
>> each pr_debug.
> 
> Here is a patch that I have used.  It is not as user friendly in terms
> of human readable stack traces (though a very small user space program
> should be able to fix that).  The patch is cut and pasted into this
> email, so probably white space damaged.

< snip >

> +
> +	if (node) {
> +		int k;
> +		int refcount = refcount_read(&node->kobj.kref.refcount);
> +		pr_err("XXX get 0x%p %3d [0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx 0x%08lx] ",
> +			node, refcount,

If this was a real patch, meant for people other than myself, the
pr_err() would instead be pr_debug().

-Frank

< snip >