From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261341AbULMVTM (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261342AbULMVTL (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:11 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199]:32208 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261341AbULMVTI (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:19:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=VpTzutDJT/RQN13M2/9sPFCPMzB/iWf47UDWV9CZ5sIQezySXivttN5YMbaQEKMuJdoXmC1AfwmTYDrPxKABxL9W6Clik5nPuzQ6U11snW+AfPKgt0NSgU+xThKmOLJSGOIiXOTNhA3u6YAdOQb/mVx7i5f31KajAMggkjSAp58= Message-ID: <58cb370e041213131941f26707@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:19:07 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" Subject: Re: Why is "SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-148F" blacklisted? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 20:58:36 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > The "SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-148F" drive is listed in drive_blacklist in > ide-dma.c. However, this drive worked well with DMA enabled with earlier > kernel versions (<=2.6.8.1) where the "via82cxxx" driver did not look at > this blacklist. So the question: what was the reason for blacklisting this > (apparently working) drive? Is it still valid? > > Details on my CD-ROM drive are pasted below. drive is removed from the blacklist, thanks for the report