From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:43:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <593D02AB.1030706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170609074529.GA9485@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
On 06/09/2017 at 03:45 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 06/09/17 at 10:29am, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 06/09/17 at 10:17am, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>>> S390 KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES is not used by note_buf_t as before, which
>>> is now defined as follows:
>>> typedef u32 note_buf_t[CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES/4];
>>> It was changed by the CONFIG_CRASH_CORE feature.
>>>
>>> This patch gets rid of all the old KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES stuff, and
>>> renames KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES to CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES for S390.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 692f66f26a4c ("crash: move crashkernel parsing and vmcore related code under CONFIG_CRASH_CORE")
>>> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/kexec.h | 2 +-
>>> include/linux/crash_core.h | 7 +++++++
>>> include/linux/kexec.h | 11 +----------
>>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kexec.h
>>> index 2f924bc..352deb8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kexec.h
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kexec.h
>>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
>>> * Seven notes plus zero note at the end: prstatus, fpregset, timer,
>>> * tod_cmp, tod_reg, control regs, and prefix
>>> */
>>> -#define KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES \
>>> +#define CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES \
>>> (ALIGN(sizeof(struct elf_note), 4) * 8 + \
>>> ALIGN(sizeof("CORE"), 4) * 7 + \
>>> ALIGN(sizeof(struct elf_prstatus), 4) + \
> I found that in mainline since below commit, above define should be
> useless, but if distribution with older kernel does need your fix, so in
> mainline the right fix should be dropping the s390 part about these
> macros usage.
Indeed, then I think we can remove this special definition of S390 to avoid confusion.
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> Anyway this need a comment from Michael.
>
> commit 8a07dd02d7615d91d65d6235f7232e3f9b5d347f
> Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Oct 14 15:53:06 2015 +0200
>
> s390/kdump: remove code to create ELF notes in the crashed system
>
> The s390 architecture can store the CPU registers of the crashed
> system
> after the kdump kernel has been started and this is the preferred
> way.
> Remove the remaining code fragments that deal with storing CPU
> registers
> while the crashed system is still active.
>
> Acked-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>
>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/crash_core.h b/include/linux/crash_core.h
>>> index e9de6b4..dbc6e5c 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/crash_core.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/crash_core.h
>>> @@ -10,9 +10,16 @@
>>> #define CRASH_CORE_NOTE_NAME_BYTES ALIGN(sizeof(CRASH_CORE_NOTE_NAME), 4)
>>> #define CRASH_CORE_NOTE_DESC_BYTES ALIGN(sizeof(struct elf_prstatus), 4)
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * The per-cpu notes area is a list of notes terminated by a "NULL"
>>> + * note header. For kdump, the code in vmcore.c runs in the context
>>> + * of the second kernel to combine them into one note.
>>> + */
>>> +#ifndef CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES
>>> #define CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES ((CRASH_CORE_NOTE_HEAD_BYTES * 2) + \
>>> CRASH_CORE_NOTE_NAME_BYTES + \
>>> CRASH_CORE_NOTE_DESC_BYTES)
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> #define VMCOREINFO_BYTES PAGE_SIZE
>>> #define VMCOREINFO_NOTE_NAME "VMCOREINFO"
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
>>> index 3ea8275..133df03 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
>>>
>>> #if !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
>>>
>>> -#include <linux/crash_core.h>
>>> #include <asm/io.h>
>>>
>>> #include <uapi/linux/kexec.h>
>>> @@ -25,6 +24,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/ioport.h>
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> #include <asm/kexec.h>
>>> +#include <linux/crash_core.h>
>>>
>>> /* Verify architecture specific macros are defined */
>>>
>>> @@ -63,15 +63,6 @@
>>> #define KEXEC_CORE_NOTE_NAME CRASH_CORE_NOTE_NAME
>>>
>>> /*
>>> - * The per-cpu notes area is a list of notes terminated by a "NULL"
>>> - * note header. For kdump, the code in vmcore.c runs in the context
>>> - * of the second kernel to combine them into one note.
>>> - */
>>> -#ifndef KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES
>>> -#define KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES CRASH_CORE_NOTE_BYTES
>>> -#endif
>> It is still not clear how does s390 use the crash_notes except this macro.
>> But from code point of view we do need to update this as well after the
>> crash_core splitting.
>>
>> Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> Hold on the ack because of the new findings, wait for Michael's
> feedback.
>
> Thanks
> Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-11 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 2:17 [PATCH] s390/crash: Fix KEXEC_NOTE_BYTES definition Xunlei Pang
2017-06-09 2:29 ` Dave Young
2017-06-09 7:45 ` Dave Young
2017-06-11 8:43 ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2017-06-09 4:12 ` Hari Bathini
2017-06-11 19:46 ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-21 9:00 ` Michael Holzheu
2017-06-21 17:44 ` Michael Holzheu
2017-06-22 9:12 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=593D02AB.1030706@redhat.com \
--to=xpang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gustavold@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).