From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261887AbVAHKTk (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:19:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262010AbVAHKRM (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:17:12 -0500 Received: from dns.toxicfilms.tv ([150.254.37.24]:59269 "EHLO dns.toxicfilms.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261887AbVAHKQr (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:16:47 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv via dns X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.23 (Clear:RC:0(213.238.102.241):. Processed in 0.029535 secs) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:25:57 +0100 From: Maciej Soltysiak X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Maciej Soltysiak X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <595522059.20050108112557@dns.toxicfilms.tv> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Maybe 2.6.10.1 ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Maybe we should release 2.6.10.1 with those security fixes, so people maintaining other trees like: -tiny, -ck, -grsec, release patches over the fixed ones. Users won't miss the fixes if they prefer some trees instead of vanilla. What do you think? Regars, Maciej