Maybe 2.6.10.1 ?

Maybe 2.6.10.1 ?

[Maciej Soltysiak]

Hello,

Maybe we should release 2.6.10.1 with those security fixes,
so people maintaining other trees like: -tiny, -ck, -grsec,
release patches over the fixed ones. Users won't miss the
fixes if they prefer some trees instead of vanilla.

What do you think?

Regars,
Maciej

Re: Maybe 2.6.10.1 ?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Maybe we should release 2.6.10.1 with those security fixes,
> so people maintaining other trees like: -tiny, -ck, -grsec,
> release patches over the fixed ones. Users won't miss the
> fixes if they prefer some trees instead of vanilla.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
I'd suggest (and I'm a comlete nobody in this regard) that instead Linus 
takes the security fixes + whatever he and Andrew deems to be "obviously 
correct and with zero risk of causing trouble" from the current -bk and 
turns that into 2.6.11-rc1, then let that stew for 2 or 3 days, then 
unless someone sees something horribly wrong, release it as 2.6.11 - then 
take whatever else is in current -bk and adds it and then that'll be 
2.6.11-bk1 and we move on from there.

-- 
Jesper Juhl