linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, "Feng Kan" <fkan@apm.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Nate Watterson" <nwatters@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ACPI: DMA ranges management
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 21:25:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59832453.2030407@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170803123239.11359-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

On 2017/8/3 20:32, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> This patch series is v3 of a previous posting:
>
> v2->v3:
> 	- Fixed DMA masks computation
>         - Fixed size computation overflow in acpi_dma_get_range()
>
> v1->v2:
> 	- Reworked acpi_dma_get_range() flow and logs
> 	- Added IORT named component address limits
> 	- Renamed acpi_dev_get_resources() helper function
> 	- Rebased against v4.13-rc3
>
> v2: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170731152323.32488-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
> v1: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170720144517.32529-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
>
> -- Original cover letter --
>
> As reported in:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAL85gmA_SSCwM80TKdkZqEe+S1beWzDEvdki1kpkmUTDRmSP7g@mail.gmail.com
>
> the bus connecting devices to an IOMMU bus can be smaller in size than
> the IOMMU input address bits which results in devices DMA HW bugs in
> particular related to IOVA allocation (ie chopping of higher address
> bits owing to system bus HW capabilities mismatch with the IOMMU).
>
> Fortunately this problem can be solved through an already present but never
> used ACPI 6.2 firmware bindings (ie _DMA object) allowing to define the DMA
> window for a specific bus in ACPI and therefore all upstream devices
> connected to it.
>
> This small patch series enables _DMA parsing in ACPI core code and
> use it in ACPI IORT code in order to detect DMA ranges for devices and
> update their data structures to make them work with their related DMA
> addressing restrictions.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> Cc: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
> Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
> Cc: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>

with the whole patch set:

Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

I tested this patch set with no _DMA in DSDT but with named
component in IORT table, seeing no regressions on D05.

Thanks
Hanjun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-03 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-03 12:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] ACPI: DMA ranges management Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] ACPICA: resource_mgr: Allow _DMA method in walk resources Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ACPI: Make acpi_dev_get_resources() method agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ACPI: Introduce DMA ranges parsing Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-06  5:12   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-06  9:42     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-06 11:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-03 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ACPI: Make acpi_dma_configure() DMA regions aware Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ACPI/IORT: Add IORT named component memory address limits Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-03 13:25 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-08-03 15:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] ACPI: DMA ranges management Will Deacon
2017-08-03 15:45 ` Nate Watterson
2017-08-03 17:21   ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-09 21:14 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-08-11  8:52   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-14 18:41 ` Feng Kan
2017-11-30  7:28 ` Feng Kan
2017-12-01  0:43   ` Feng Kan
2017-12-01 10:39     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59832453.2030407@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=fkan@apm.com \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nwatters@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).