From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966126AbcHESvc (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:51:32 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:65287 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423983AbcHESvX (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:51:23 -0400 Subject: Re: mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() To: Lee Jones References: <20160608111442.GB14888@dell> <75c1cc23-3a2d-db78-d0f2-b5934b18e828@users.sourceforge.net> <20160628150725.GL24982@dell> <20160628163146.GG29166@dell> <69e96aa0-f3d9-d70d-c3ec-d39b5e9d9f14@users.sourceforge.net> <20160701091732.GK1707@dell> <8c0c2f06-4746-33d4-e40c-987ca3ca51dc@users.sourceforge.net> <20160805075016.GM5243@dell> Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <59b148eb-6a14-0721-7e4e-60b438fe8ec6@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 20:51:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160805075016.GM5243@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gWQsg1l/nsj44vKA7JHfiPR8oYtLwnoj2DdLnqyKW5w1+VCsWoN hpRPwS2M3L4qGOs7abnZbF1PJLeAFlFd360HsX74nPt8sRCeGXr29fNhuU0cIk0IcYG13da Cifettxbgv57bnRBzXhRK0Nf+FH8WYLARRiymlMy1rexUKCegYivC5OIFVzNvWSoS2GvV0J O8j6OLVtE+heOeAsJqlvg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cNSFQDwFf/g=:AO9C+cvK40Xm6aF5IIZaOd LZ5yZWQLTqj49x/w0OUL3Naxp1iWkhheylwQABsFgcRJYU85lykgY4Skd/4Aw+1apXDr36pcB 4YbwayYUfPHvEPl687EsjgYo1zIyIUqfFKVL/ERef8TiY4Y7qi3/dSDr5iwRIOJPOePyRbBAj EjwAaK0oeAtgmAKvN6jRdvmjRnjs505lmOHoj4HbOvfxmhf99841QCn53aARaPY5n8rEQ9zZN Blq2uHidMuWp8R+qvbLBFpIdtv3cNEHJXAxFU0bD7IU4c6PlLnCvWmvhU1pNFIUVnx6ndCY8M bziOEn1WWo5xn+eiUnrOA1Btbj6oSDgoUqDowGxBeW/6TC0CR3hLfXcu233PiMTTW3nTmM6ay gVg+XGki0gxhMfyom6Jqn29vTLsG4KungEe95Zd1Lgw9ya1ef55Si62hZCvrT72qnaxyDEK+l 7jTzhk5lWQG7Gra64cOOIglThg2cYuk6ll96nZHUEMmlhvZLrpBqq0MjG4i2Et4Hbujz9aHPU 01R+sLaijltCn48dy2f+AT4ziFQ+YuHCeVldY+6jzCCXWvBa6+QRTSmHdA65QzBpgJ0CNHfkO kK0LdM93g/kWE486hv86+gU6AqyxIfR77jrvkbPCbWzfdin29qjBtFGUxjFQQPBqgxA9dzGBO klNRLqp/GWaP+IUX03j1YyyQqvxkPNGFRbmNS7j+qdN2eWjWOeGW56N3UEHf/Vi3Xofg18JqG kTy+7SiBdNus9OV2DsEKMoGkS6ZwYjflBQX2nH1Jn5VPZ2LI5khaEHHRGOQew+C6Pzs4HdJ4z CDp4mTK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'm unsure if you're not re-submitting because you're waiting for an > answer for me or not. I found your five commits (on 2016-06-29) for this patch series sufficient in principle. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=d313cdde71ec9a5c327a515c37a0dca2cca00de5 > If you are, here it is. And, don't do that. :) I find this feedback a bit strange. > Please submit your patch-set *not* connected to this, now very > tangled web of submissions, complete with all the Acks you've > accrued. I would find it nice if another one of my update suggestions could be integrated after a bit of feedback evolved for a special source code search pattern. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9199519/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9208925/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9210291/ It seems to be harder to achieve acceptance similar to the others. Regards, Markus