linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"alan@linux.intel.com" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [char-misc-next 07/15] mei: use wrietl/readl instead of io wrappers
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:28:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B01E9DED6@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121204143151.1cce530a@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>

> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static inline u32 mei_reg_read(const struct
> > mei_device *dev,  static inline void mei_reg_write(const struct mei_device
> *dev,
> >  				 unsigned long offset, u32 value)  {
> > -	iowrite32(value, dev->mem_addr + offset);
> > +	writel(value, dev->mem_addr + offset);
> 
> ioremap should match readl/writel
> iomap iowrite32/ioread32

Thanks, I can replace pci_iomap with pci_ioremap_bar although in low level it is doing just the same.


> so you need to tweak the map/unmap if you do this.
> 
> As to overhead. I'd love to see a measurement that can detect the
> difference. Do you have a benchmark that shows it ?

Don't have any numbers but it seems reasonable to me.
 I did following this example

commit 05f5b97ee0013fefbd9139cf8c3eda5f2a88c04a
Author: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 7 09:52:26 2012 -0800
 
    iwlwifi: use writeb,writel,readl directly
    
    That change will save us some CPU cycles at run time. Having port-based
    I/O seems to be not possible for PCIe devices.
    
    Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>

Thanks
Tomas


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-04 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-04 14:04 [char-misc-next 01/15] mei: drop redundant length paramter from mei_write_message function Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 02/15] mei: use unified format for printing mei message header Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 03/15] mei: move internal host clients ids to mei_dev.h from hw.h Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 04/15] mei: extarct device dependent constants into hw-mei.h Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 05/15] mei: inlude local headers after the system ones Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 06/15] mei: kill not used BAR0 length and base variables Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 07/15] mei: use wrietl/readl instead of io wrappers Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:31   ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 15:28     ` Winkler, Tomas [this message]
2012-12-04 15:37       ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 16:02         ` Winkler, Tomas
2012-12-04 16:06           ` Alan Cox
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 08/15] mei: mei_me_client is not hw API move to mei_dev.h Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 09/15] mei: move hw dependent constructs to interface.c Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 10/15] mei: move host bus message handling to hbm.c Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 11/15] mei: drop non existent function prototype Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 12/15] mei: simplify preparing client host bus messages Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 13/15] mei: use structured buffer for write buffer Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 14/15] mei: add common prefix to hbm function Tomas Winkler
2012-12-04 14:04 ` [char-misc-next 15/15] mei: move hbm responses from interrupt.c to hbm.c Tomas Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B01E9DED6@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).