linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Zaibo <xuzaibo@huawei.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	<tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	<sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>, <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
	<jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:50:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BC454DF.6010109@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3ffd1a3-be4b-f041-e4da-2bbf065aa065@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

On 2018/10/15 10:48, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/13/2018 04:25 PM, Xu Zaibo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018/10/12 13:16, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Mediate Device is a framework for fine-grained physical device
>>> sharing across the isolated domains. Currently the mdev framework
>>> is designed to be independent of the platform IOMMU support. As the
>>> result, the DMA isolation relies on the mdev parent device in a
>>> vendor specific way.
>>>
>>> There are several cases where a mediated device could be protected
>>> and isolated by the platform IOMMU. For example, Intel vt-d rev3.0
>>> [1] introduces a new translation mode called 'scalable mode', which
>>> enables PASID-granular translations. The vt-d scalable mode is the
>>> key ingredient for Scalable I/O Virtualization [2] [3] which allows
>>> sharing a device in minimal possible granularity (ADI - Assignable
>>> Device Interface).
>>>
>>> A mediated device backed by an ADI could be protected and isolated
>>> by the IOMMU since 1) the parent device supports tagging an unique
>>> PASID to all DMA traffic out of the mediated device; and 2) the DMA
>>> translation unit (IOMMU) supports the PASID granular translation.
>>> We can apply IOMMU protection and isolation to this kind of devices
>>> just as what we are doing with an assignable PCI device.
>>>
>>> In order to distinguish the IOMMU-capable mediated devices from those
>>> which still need to rely on parent devices, this patch set adds two
>>> new members in struct mdev_device.
>>>
>>> * iommu_device
>>>    - This, if set, indicates that the mediated device could
>>>      be fully isolated and protected by IOMMU via attaching
>>>      an iommu domain to this device. If empty, it indicates
>>>      using vendor defined isolation.
>>>
>>> * iommu_domain
>>>    - This is a place holder for an iommu domain. A domain
>>>      could be store here for later use once it has been
>>>      attached to the iommu_device of this mdev.
>>>
>>> Below helpers are added to set and get above iommu device
>>> and iommu domain pointers in mdev core implementation.
>>>
>>> * mdev_set/get_iommu_device(dev, iommu_device)
>>>    - Set or get the iommu device which represents this mdev
>>>      in IOMMU's device scope. Drivers don't need to set the
>>>      iommu device if it uses vendor defined isolation.
>>>
>>> * mdev_set/get_iommu_domain(domain)
>>>    - A iommu domain which has been attached to the iommu
>>>      device in order to protect and isolate the mediated
>>>      device will be kept in the mdev data structure and
>>>      could be retrieved later.
>>>
>>> The mdev parent device driver could opt-in that the mdev could be
>>> fully isolated and protected by the IOMMU when the mdev is being
>>> created by invoking mdev_set_iommu_device() in its @create().
>> I just cannot understand here, how to get an iommu_device while I 
>> create mediated
>> device in my parent device driver?
>
> When you are creating an mdev in your parent driver, you should know
> which PCI device this mdev belonging to.
>

So, generally, I can set the parent device as mdev's iommu_device?
If that, however, Mdev already holds its parent device. So, I just 
figure what
differences between Mdev's parent device and iommu_device are.
>>
>> And why not reuse the device of MDEV instread of adding a new device 
>> here?
>
> iommu_device in the mdev_device structure represents the PCI device
> that represents this mdev in iommu's device scope. IOMMU is only aware
> of pci devices, it's not aware of mdev device.

Could I understand like that: IOMMU can be aware of the parent device of 
Mdev?
And more, I am doubting the necessary of iommu_device in Mdev.

Thanks,
Zaibo

.







  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-15  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-12  5:16 [PATCH v3 0/8] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add APIs for multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] iommu/vt-d: Add multiple domains per device query Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Enable/disable multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Attach/detach domains in auxiliary mode Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] iommu/vt-d: Return ID associated with an auxiliary domain Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] vfio/mdev: Add iommu place holders in mdev_device Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers Lu Baolu
2018-10-12  5:16 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] vfio/type1: Handle different mdev isolation type Lu Baolu
2018-10-13  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Xu Zaibo
2018-10-15  2:48   ` Lu Baolu
2018-10-15  8:50     ` Xu Zaibo [this message]
2018-10-16  1:21       ` Lu Baolu
2018-10-17  2:02         ` Xu Zaibo
2018-10-17  2:10           ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BC454DF.6010109@huawei.com \
    --to=xuzaibo@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).