From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F26C43441 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953DF2082F for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:09:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 953DF2082F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726296AbeKZTCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:02:44 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:39378 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726248AbeKZTCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:02:44 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wAQ89Mu2107406; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:09:22 -0600 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wAQ89Mfv077426 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:09:22 -0600 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:09:21 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:09:21 -0600 Received: from [192.168.2.6] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wAQ89HBR020849; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:09:18 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] soc: ti: pruss: Add a PRUSS irqchip driver for PRUSS interrupts To: Tony Lindgren References: <1542886753-17625-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1542886753-17625-9-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20181123163742.GC53235@atomide.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: Roger Quadros Message-ID: <5BFBAA2D.8020601@ti.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:09:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181123163742.GC53235@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tony, On 23/11/18 18:37, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [181122 11:39]: >> The PRUSS INTC module is reference counted during the interrupt >> setup phase through the irqchip's irq_request_resources() and >> irq_release_resources() ops. This restricts the module from being >> removed as long as there are active interrupt users. > > So are there any reasons why this could not be just a regular > drivers/irqchip driver nowadays? This is a regular irqchip driver. Do you mean it should be moved to drivers/irqchip directory? cheers, -roger -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki