* [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
@ 2019-09-03 6:15 zhong jiang
2019-09-04 17:50 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhong jiang @ 2019-09-03 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: airlied, daniel
Cc: alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, David1.Zhou, amd-gfx,
zhongjiang, linux-kernel
debugfs_remove and kfree has taken the null check in account.
hence it is unnecessary to check it. Just remove the condition.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
index 5652cc7..cb94627 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
@@ -1077,8 +1077,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_ib_preempt(void *data, u64 val)
ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev, resched);
- if (fences)
- kfree(fences);
+ kfree(fences);
return 0;
}
@@ -1103,8 +1102,7 @@ int amdgpu_debugfs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
void amdgpu_debugfs_preempt_cleanup(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
- if (adev->debugfs_preempt)
- debugfs_remove(adev->debugfs_preempt);
+ debugfs_remove(adev->debugfs_preempt);
}
#else
--
1.7.12.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
2019-09-03 6:15 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check zhong jiang
@ 2019-09-04 17:50 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-05 5:48 ` zhong jiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2019-09-04 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhong jiang, Chunming Zhou, David Airlie, Alex Deucher,
Christian König, Daniel Vetter, amd-gfx
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
> debugfs_remove and kfree has taken the null check in account.
> hence it is unnecessary to check it. Just remove the condition.
How do you think about a wording like the following?
The functions “debugfs_remove” and “kfree” tolerate the passing
of null pointers. Hence it is unnecessary to check such arguments
around the calls. Thus remove the extra condition check at two places.
> No functional change.
I find this information questionable while it is partly reasonable
according to the shown software refactoring.
Can a subject like “[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Remove two redundant
null pointer checks” be nicer here?
Were any source code analysis tools involved for finding
these update candidates?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
2019-09-04 17:50 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2019-09-05 5:48 ` zhong jiang
2019-09-05 8:38 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhong jiang @ 2019-09-05 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring; +Cc: LKML
On 2019/9/5 1:50, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> debugfs_remove and kfree has taken the null check in account.
>> hence it is unnecessary to check it. Just remove the condition.
> How do you think about a wording like the following?
>
> The functions “debugfs_remove” and “kfree” tolerate the passing
> of null pointers. Hence it is unnecessary to check such arguments
> around the calls. Thus remove the extra condition check at two places.
>
It's better, Thanks
>> No functional change.
> I find this information questionable while it is partly reasonable
> according to the shown software refactoring.
>
> Can a subject like “[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Remove two redundant
> null pointer checks” be nicer here?
>
It's more clearer, thanks, Will repost using above description in v2.
> Were any source code analysis tools involved for finding
> these update candidates?
With the help of Coccinelle. You can find out some example in scripts/coccinelle/.
Sincerely,
zhong jiang
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
2019-09-05 5:48 ` zhong jiang
@ 2019-09-05 8:38 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-05 8:46 ` zhong jiang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2019-09-05 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhong jiang, amd-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors
>> Were any source code analysis tools involved for finding
>> these update candidates?
> With the help of Coccinelle. You can find out some example in scripts/coccinelle/.
Thanks for such background information.
Was the script “ifnullfree.cocci” applied here?
Will it be helpful to add attribution for such tools
to any more descriptions in your patches?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
2019-09-05 8:38 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2019-09-05 8:46 ` zhong jiang
2019-09-13 21:04 ` Alex Deucher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: zhong jiang @ 2019-09-05 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Elfring; +Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, LKML, kernel-janitors
On 2019/9/5 16:38, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Were any source code analysis tools involved for finding
>>> these update candidates?
>> With the help of Coccinelle. You can find out some example in scripts/coccinelle/.
> Thanks for such background information.
> Was the script “ifnullfree.cocci” applied here?
Yep
> Will it be helpful to add attribution for such tools
> to any more descriptions in your patches?
Sometimes, I will add the description in my patches. Not always.
Thanks,
zhong jiang
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check
2019-09-05 8:46 ` zhong jiang
@ 2019-09-13 21:04 ` Alex Deucher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2019-09-13 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhong jiang
Cc: Markus Elfring, kernel-janitors, Maling list - DRI developers,
amd-gfx list, LKML
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:01 AM zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019/9/5 16:38, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>> Were any source code analysis tools involved for finding
> >>> these update candidates?
> >> With the help of Coccinelle. You can find out some example in scripts/coccinelle/.
> > Thanks for such background information.
> > Was the script “ifnullfree.cocci” applied here?
> Yep
> > Will it be helpful to add attribution for such tools
> > to any more descriptions in your patches?
> Sometimes, I will add the description in my patches. Not always.
Applied with some minor tweaks to the commit message.
Thanks!
Alex
>
> Thanks,
> zhong jiang
> > Regards,
> > Markus
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-13 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-03 6:15 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove the redundant null check zhong jiang
2019-09-04 17:50 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-05 5:48 ` zhong jiang
2019-09-05 8:38 ` Markus Elfring
2019-09-05 8:46 ` zhong jiang
2019-09-13 21:04 ` Alex Deucher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).