From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755400AbdEHTEw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 8 May 2017 15:04:52 -0400
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([65.50.211.136]:46555 "EHLO mail.zytor.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752364AbdEHTEv (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 8 May 2017 15:04:51 -0400
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:57:59 -0700
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20170508144049.6x67526a677g2miw@treble>
References: <20170505122200.31436-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20170505122200.31436-7-jslaby@suse.cz> <CA+55aFzEF_A1MzH8P8EX35FSci7UFj_+5LdsEFVai1DYtCk-Hg@mail.gmail.com> <20170507165524.cdxfuwbd5alr7v6k@treble> <CALCETrWan_2AVds=LfneJFDH66swPasirGBiYU+LDK15M_fBew@mail.gmail.com> <20170508144049.6x67526a677g2miw@treble>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
From: hpa@zytor.com
Message-ID: <5EAB44CD-482B-485F-A0E0-0AE7937FFF2C@zytor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On May 8, 2017 7:40:49 AM PDT, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 10:35:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I think that, if the code were sufficiently robust, it would be handy
>> if the unwinder displayed function arguments.  DWARF can do that to a
>> limited extent.
>
>Honestly I get the feeling that displaying function arguments wouldn't
>be realistic (DWARF or no DWARF).  On x86-64, arguments are passed in
>registers, so tracking down their values is a lot more involved than
>just looking at the stack.
>
>The DWARF CFI only shows you the callee-saved registers.  To figure out
>the other registers you'd have to dive into the other DWARF sections
>and
>examine previous stack frames for clues.  I think it's not a
>deterministic process, based on how often I see gdb complain with
>'<value optimized out>'.  I'd bet it's a lot harder than a basic stack
>dump.
>
>Also, most kernel functions rely on pointer arguments, which are pretty
>much useless without dumping the contents of the structs they point to.
>But then doing that properly would be a whole new level of difficulty.

At some point you are just reinventing k(g)db...
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.