From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607E3ECDE32 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087A721526 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:49:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 087A721526 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727103AbeJQRn5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:43:57 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2099 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726691AbeJQRn5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:43:57 -0400 Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 195FB52B42EFE; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:49:00 +0100 (IST) Received: from FRAEML704-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.206.14.35) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:49:01 +0100 Received: from FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.206]) by FRAEML704-CAH.china.huawei.com ([10.206.14.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:48:54 +0200 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: kbuild test robot CC: "kbuild-all@01.org" , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" , John Garry , "pabba@codeaurora.org" , "vkilari@codeaurora.org" , "rruigrok@codeaurora.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linuxarm , "neil.m.leeder@gmail.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/smmuv3: Add MSI irq support Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/smmuv3: Add MSI irq support Thread-Index: AQHUZU7452VJ+Ekpgk2jv+dRJ9wIK6UiqNuAgACFu2A= Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:48:53 +0000 Message-ID: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA83879F3FB@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <20181016124920.24708-4-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <201810171145.mGVw4SgU%fengguang.wu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <201810171145.mGVw4SgU%fengguang.wu@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.202.227.237] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: kbuild test robot [mailto:lkp@intel.com] > Sent: 17 October 2018 04:36 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > Cc: kbuild-all@01.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; robin.murphy@arm.com; > jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com; will.deacon@arm.com; > mark.rutland@arm.com; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) ; > John Garry ; pabba@codeaurora.org; > vkilari@codeaurora.org; rruigrok@codeaurora.org; linux- > acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; Linuxarm ; > neil.m.leeder@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/smmuv3: Add MSI irq support > > Hi Shameer, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on linux-sof-driver/master] > [also build test ERROR on v4.19-rc8 next-20181016] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shameer-Kolothum/arm64- > SMMUv3-PMU-driver-with-IORT-support/20181017-063949 > base: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux master > config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: sh4-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 > reproduce: > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp- > tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=sh > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11:0, > from include/linux/list.h:9, > from include/linux/resource_ext.h:17, > from include/linux/acpi.h:26, > from drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:37: > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c: In function > 'smmu_pmu_counter_set_value': > include/linux/bitops.h:7:24: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift- > count-overflow] > #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr)) > ^ > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:152:31: note: in expansion of macro 'BIT' > if (smmu_pmu->counter_mask & BIT(32)) > ^~~ > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c: In function > 'smmu_pmu_counter_get_value': > include/linux/bitops.h:7:24: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift- > count-overflow] > #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr)) > ^ > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:162:31: note: in expansion of macro 'BIT' > if (smmu_pmu->counter_mask & BIT(32)) > ^~~ > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c: In function 'smmu_pmu_free_msis': > >> drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:601:2: error: implicit declaration of > function 'platform_msi_domain_free_irqs'; did you mean > 'platform_get_device_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > platform_msi_domain_free_irqs(dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ok. This is probably because of the COMPILE_TEST added to patch #2 and this one will have dependency on PCI/PCI_MSI. I will remove that in next revision. Thanks, Shameer > platform_get_device_id > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c: In function 'smmu_pmu_setup_msi': > >> drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:632:8: error: implicit declaration of > function 'platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs'; did you mean > 'platform_device_alloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > ret = platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(dev, 1, smmu_pmu_write_msi_msg); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > platform_device_alloc > In file included from include/linux/list.h:9:0, > from include/linux/resource_ext.h:17, > from include/linux/acpi.h:26, > from drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:37: > include/linux/msi.h:114:38: error: 'struct device' has no member named > 'msi_list' > #define dev_to_msi_list(dev) (&(dev)->msi_list) > ^ > include/linux/kernel.h:961:26: note: in definition of macro 'container_of' > void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr); \ > ^~~ > include/linux/list.h:377:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_entry' > list_entry((ptr)->next, type, member) > ^~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_first_entry' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:19: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_to_msi_list' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:638:9: note: in expansion of macro > 'first_msi_entry' > desc = first_msi_entry(dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from include/linux/ioport.h:13:0, > from include/linux/acpi.h:25, > from drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:37: > include/linux/msi.h:114:38: error: 'struct device' has no member named > 'msi_list' > #define dev_to_msi_list(dev) (&(dev)->msi_list) > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:316:19: note: in definition of macro > '__compiletime_assert' > bool __cond = !(condition); \ > ^~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/compiler.h:339:2: note: in expansion of macro > '_compiletime_assert' > _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/build_bug.h:45:37: note: in expansion of macro > 'compiletime_assert' > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/kernel.h:962:2: note: in expansion of macro > 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' > BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) && \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/kernel.h:962:20: note: in expansion of macro '__same_type' > BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) && \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/list.h:366:2: note: in expansion of macro 'container_of' > container_of(ptr, type, member) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/list.h:377:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_entry' > list_entry((ptr)->next, type, member) > ^~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_first_entry' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:19: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_to_msi_list' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:638:9: note: in expansion of macro > 'first_msi_entry' > desc = first_msi_entry(dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:114:38: error: 'struct device' has no member named > 'msi_list' > #define dev_to_msi_list(dev) (&(dev)->msi_list) > ^ > include/linux/compiler.h:316:19: note: in definition of macro > '__compiletime_assert' > bool __cond = !(condition); \ > ^~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/compiler.h:339:2: note: in expansion of macro > '_compiletime_assert' > _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/build_bug.h:45:37: note: in expansion of macro > 'compiletime_assert' > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/kernel.h:962:2: note: in expansion of macro > 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' > BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) && \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/kernel.h:963:6: note: in expansion of macro '__same_type' > !__same_type(*(ptr), void), \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/list.h:366:2: note: in expansion of macro 'container_of' > container_of(ptr, type, member) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/list.h:377:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_entry' > list_entry((ptr)->next, type, member) > ^~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:2: note: in expansion of macro 'list_first_entry' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/msi.h:116:19: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_to_msi_list' > list_first_entry(dev_to_msi_list((dev)), struct msi_desc, list) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:638:9: note: in expansion of macro > 'first_msi_entry' > desc = first_msi_entry(dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c: In function 'smmu_pmu_probe': > drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c:745:64: warning: format '%llx' expects > argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type > 'resource_size_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] > name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "smmuv3_pmcg_%llx", > ~~~^ > %x > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > vim +601 drivers//perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c > > 596 > 597 static void smmu_pmu_free_msis(void *data) > 598 { > 599 struct device *dev = data; > 600 > > 601 platform_msi_domain_free_irqs(dev); > 602 } > 603 > 604 static void smmu_pmu_write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc, struct > msi_msg *msg) > 605 { > 606 phys_addr_t doorbell; > 607 struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc); > 608 struct smmu_pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > 609 > 610 doorbell = (((u64)msg->address_hi) << 32) | msg->address_lo; > 611 doorbell &= MSI_CFG0_ADDR_MASK; > 612 > 613 writeq_relaxed(doorbell, pmu->reg_base + > SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CFG0); > 614 writel_relaxed(msg->data, pmu->reg_base + > SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CFG1); > 615 writel_relaxed(MSI_CFG2_MEMATTR_DEVICE_nGnRE, > 616 pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CFG2); > 617 } > 618 > 619 static void smmu_pmu_setup_msi(struct smmu_pmu *pmu) > 620 { > 621 struct msi_desc *desc; > 622 struct device *dev = pmu->dev; > 623 int ret; > 624 > 625 /* Clear MSI address reg */ > 626 writeq_relaxed(0, pmu->reg_base + > SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CFG0); > 627 > 628 /* MSI supported or not */ > 629 if (!(readl(pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_CFGR) & > SMMU_PMCG_CFGR_MSI)) > 630 return; > 631 > > 632 ret = platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(dev, 1, > smmu_pmu_write_msi_msg); > 633 if (ret) { > 634 dev_warn(dev, "failed to allocate MSIs\n"); > 635 return; > 636 } > 637 > > 638 desc = first_msi_entry(dev); > 639 if (desc) > 640 pmu->irq = desc->irq; > 641 > 642 /* Add callback to free MSIs on teardown */ > 643 devm_add_action(dev, smmu_pmu_free_msis, dev); > 644 } > 645 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation