From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: correctly check policy index in verify_newpolicy_info
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:17:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a576347-45e2-edf9-f304-b98057893eb1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190225134330.ohrvjssdnsmcyxnp@gondor.apana.org.au>
On 2019/2/25 21:43, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 05:56:00PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>>
>> the check. Then __xfrm_policy_unlink use the index to access array policy_count
>> whose size is XFRM_POLICY_MAX * 2, triggering out of bounds access.
>
> No it doesn't. Even if it did the bug would be in __xfrm_policy_unlink
> and not here.
>
Yes, my fix is wrong.
The issue is triggered as this:
xfrm_add_policy
-->verify_newpolicy_info //here check the index provided by user with XFRM_POLICY_MAX
//In my case, the index is 0x6E6BB6, so it pass the check.
-->xfrm_policy_construct //copy the user's policy and set xfrm_policy_timer
-->xfrm_policy_insert
--> __xfrm_policy_link //use the orgin dir, in my case is 2
--> xfrm_gen_index //generate policy index, there is 0x6E6BB6
then xfrm_policy_timer be fired
xfrm_policy_timer
--> xfrm_policy_id2dir //get dir from policy index & 7, in my case is 6
--> xfrm_policy_delete
--> __xfrm_policy_unlink //There access policy_count[dir], it trigger out of range access
So maybe the fix is like this:
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 8d1a898..b27eb742 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -316,6 +316,8 @@ static void xfrm_policy_timer(struct timer_list *t)
goto out;
dir = xfrm_policy_id2dir(xp->index);
+ if (dir >= XFRM_POLICY_MAX * 2)
+ dir = dir & XFRM_POLICY_MAX;
if (xp->lft.hard_add_expires_seconds) {
time64_t tmo = xp->lft.hard_add_expires_seconds +
> Your patch makes no sense.
>
> Cheers,
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-25 9:56 [PATCH v2] xfrm: correctly check policy index in verify_newpolicy_info Yue Haibing
2019-02-25 13:43 ` Herbert Xu
2019-02-27 3:17 ` YueHaibing [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a576347-45e2-edf9-f304-b98057893eb1@huawei.com \
--to=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).