[PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[Filipe Laíns]

The Logitech G Powerplay has a lightspeed receiver with a static HID++
device with ID 7 attached to it to. It is used to configure the led on
the mat. For this reason I increased the max number of devices.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@archlinux.org>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
index bb50d6e7745b..79294b873057 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include "hid-ids.h"
 
-#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			6
+#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			7
 #define DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFS			8
 #define DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX			0
 #define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN			1
-#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			6
+#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			7
 
 #define DJREPORT_SHORT_LENGTH			15
 #define DJREPORT_LONG_LENGTH			32
@@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static void logi_hidpp_recv_queue_notif(struct hid_device *hdev,
 		break;
 	}
 
+	/* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
+	if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
+		workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
+	}
+
 	if (workitem.type == WORKITEM_TYPE_EMPTY) {
 		hid_warn(hdev,
 			 "unusable device of type %s (0x%02x) connected on slot %d",
-- 
2.24.1

Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[Filipe Laíns]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]

On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 20:18 +0000, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> The Logitech G Powerplay has a lightspeed receiver with a static
> HID++
> device with ID 7 attached to it to. It is used to configure the led
> on
> the mat. For this reason I increased the max number of devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@archlinux.org>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-
> logitech-dj.c
> index bb50d6e7745b..79294b873057 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include "hid-ids.h"
>  
> -#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			6
> +#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			7
>  #define DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFS			8
>  #define DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX			0
>  #define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN			1
> -#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			6
> +#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			7
>  
>  #define DJREPORT_SHORT_LENGTH			15
>  #define DJREPORT_LONG_LENGTH			32
> @@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static void logi_hidpp_recv_queue_notif(struct
> hid_device *hdev,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
> +	if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
> +		workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (workitem.type == WORKITEM_TYPE_EMPTY) {
>  		hid_warn(hdev,
>  			 "unusable device of type %s (0x%02x) connected
> on slot %d",

Benjamin, is there any updates on this? Were you able to test it?

Thank you,
Filipe Laíns

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[Jiri Kosina]

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Filipe Laíns wrote:

> The Logitech G Powerplay has a lightspeed receiver with a static HID++
> device with ID 7 attached to it to. It is used to configure the led on
> the mat. For this reason I increased the max number of devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@archlinux.org>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> index bb50d6e7745b..79294b873057 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include "hid-ids.h"
>  
> -#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			6
> +#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			7
>  #define DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFS			8
>  #define DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX			0
>  #define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN			1
> -#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			6
> +#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			7
>  
>  #define DJREPORT_SHORT_LENGTH			15
>  #define DJREPORT_LONG_LENGTH			32
> @@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static void logi_hidpp_recv_queue_notif(struct hid_device *hdev,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
> +	if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
> +		workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
> +	}
> +

I guess we can't do anything else than to trust Logitech that they will 
not assign conflicting device_index ID in the future to something that 
will not be HID++, right?

Or is this properly documented somewhere?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[Filipe Laíns]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2097 bytes --]

On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 14:50 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> 
> > The Logitech G Powerplay has a lightspeed receiver with a static HID++
> > device with ID 7 attached to it to. It is used to configure the led on
> > the mat. For this reason I increased the max number of devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@archlinux.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> > index bb50d6e7745b..79294b873057 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
> >  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> >  #include "hid-ids.h"
> >  
> > -#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			6
> > +#define DJ_MAX_PAIRED_DEVICES			7
> >  #define DJ_MAX_NUMBER_NOTIFS			8
> >  #define DJ_RECEIVER_INDEX			0
> >  #define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MIN			1
> > -#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			6
> > +#define DJ_DEVICE_INDEX_MAX			7
> >  
> >  #define DJREPORT_SHORT_LENGTH			15
> >  #define DJREPORT_LONG_LENGTH			32
> > @@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static void logi_hidpp_recv_queue_notif(struct hid_device *hdev,
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
> > +	if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
> > +		workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> I guess we can't do anything else than to trust Logitech that they will 
> not assign conflicting device_index ID in the future to something that 
> will not be HID++, right?
> 
> Or is this properly documented somewhere?
> 
> Thanks,


CCing Nestor

Yes, we need to trust Logitech on this. There's isn't anything
documented regarding this AFAIK.

Even if Logitech released a device with index 7 that didn't support
HID++, it wouldn't be that big of an issue. We would just end up with a
hidraw node which would export a vendor page report descriptor but the
device wouldn't actually reply to anything.

Regards,
Filipe Laíns

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-dj: add support for the static device in the Powerplay mat/receiver

[Jiri Kosina]

On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Filipe Laíns wrote:

> > > +	/* custom receiver device (eg. powerplay) */
> > > +	if (hidpp_report->device_index == 7) {
> > > +		workitem.reports_supported |= HIDPP;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > 
> > I guess we can't do anything else than to trust Logitech that they will 
> > not assign conflicting device_index ID in the future to something that 
> > will not be HID++, right?
> > 
> > Or is this properly documented somewhere?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> 
> CCing Nestor
> 
> Yes, we need to trust Logitech on this. There's isn't anything
> documented regarding this AFAIK.
> 
> Even if Logitech released a device with index 7 that didn't support
> HID++, it wouldn't be that big of an issue. We would just end up with a
> hidraw node which would export a vendor page report descriptor but the
> device wouldn't actually reply to anything.

Given the silence from Nestor, I guess we can just apply this for 5.7; 
pushing to for-5.7/logitech branch.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs