linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk" <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"treding@nvidia.com" <treding@nvidia.com>,
	"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kthota@nvidia.com" <kthota@nvidia.com>,
	"mmaddireddy@nvidia.com" <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
	"sagar.tv@gmail.com" <sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:21:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b4a728e-bfa3-42a2-423d-e270e8993901@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SLXP216MB0477F0B10AEBEAD996EE66D3AAE80@SLXP216MB0477.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>



On 11/11/2020 9:57 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 11/11/20, 7:12 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>>
>> DesignWare core has a TLP digest (TD) override bit in one of the control
>> registers of ATU. This bit also needs to be programmed for proper ECRC
>> functionality. This is currently identified as an issue with DesignWare
>> IP version 4.90a.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> ---
>> V2:
>> * Addressed Bjorn's comments
>>
>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index c2dea8fc97c8..ec0d13ab6bad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -225,6 +225,46 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
>>        dw_pcie_writel_atu(pci, offset + reg, val);
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline u32 dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(u32 val)
> 
> What is the reason to use inline here?
Actually, I wanted to move the programming part inside the respective 
APIs but then I wanted to give some details as well in comments so to 
avoid duplication, I came up with this function. But, I'm making it 
inline for better code optimization by compiler.

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 
>> +{
>> +     /*
>> +      * DesignWare core version 4.90A has this strange design issue
>> +      * where the 'TD' bit in the Control register-1 of the ATU outbound
>> +      * region acts like an override for the ECRC setting i.e. the presence
>> +      * of TLP Digest(ECRC) in the outgoing TLPs is solely determined by
>> +      * this bit. This is contrary to the PCIe spec which says that the
>> +      * enablement of the ECRC is solely determined by the AER registers.
>> +      *
>> +      * Because of this, even when the ECRC is enabled through AER
>> +      * registers, the transactions going through ATU won't have TLP Digest
>> +      * as there is no way the AER sub-system could program the TD bit which
>> +      * is specific to DesignWare core.
>> +      *
>> +      * The best way to handle this scenario is to program the TD bit
>> +      * always. It affects only the traffic from root port to downstream
>> +      * devices.
>> +      *
>> +      * At this point,
>> +      * When ECRC is enabled in AER registers, everything works normally
>> +      * When ECRC is NOT enabled in AER registers, then,
>> +      * on Root Port:- TLP Digest (DWord size) gets appended to each packet
>> +      *                even through it is not required. Since downstream
>> +      *                TLPs are mostly for configuration accesses and BAR
>> +      *                accesses, they are not in critical path and won't
>> +      *                have much negative effect on the performance.
>> +      * on End Point:- TLP Digest is received for some/all the packets coming
>> +      *                from the root port. TLP Digest is ignored because,
>> +      *                as per the PCIe Spec r5.0 v1.0 section 2.2.3
>> +      *                "TLP Digest Rules", when an endpoint receives TLP
>> +      *                Digest when its ECRC check functionality is disabled
>> +      *                in AER registers, received TLP Digest is just ignored.
>> +      * Since there is no issue or error reported either side, best way to
>> +      * handle the scenario is to program TD bit by default.
>> +      */
>> +
>> +     return val | PCIE_ATU_TD;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>>                                             int index, int type,
>>                                             u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr,
>> @@ -245,8 +285,10 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>>                                 lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
>>        dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET,
>>                                 upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> -     dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1,
>> -                              type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
>> +     val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>> +     if (pci->version == 0x490A)
>> +             val = dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(val);
>> +     dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
>>        dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL2,
>>                                 PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);
>>
>> @@ -292,8 +334,10 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>>                           lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
>>        dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
>>                           upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> -     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type |
>> -                        PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
>> +     val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>> +     if (pci->version == 0x490A)
>> +             val = dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(val);
>> +     dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, val);
>>        dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);
>>
>>        /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> index 9d2f511f13fa..285c0ae364ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO             0x2
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0           0x4
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1           0x5
>> +#define PCIE_ATU_TD                  BIT(8)
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(pf)           ((pf) << 20)
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_CR2                 0x908
>>   #define PCIE_ATU_ENABLE                      BIT(31)
>> --
>> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-11 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-09 19:26 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC Vidya Sagar
2020-11-10 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-11 12:11 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar
2020-11-11 16:27   ` Jingoo Han
2020-11-11 16:51     ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2020-11-11 22:29       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-12 17:02         ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-24 10:20           ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-24 21:02             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-03 12:10               ` Vidya Sagar
2020-12-11 13:58                 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-12-11 14:49                   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-11 15:15                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-12-11 16:54                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-11 17:17                       ` Rob Herring
2020-12-07 14:18 ` [PATCH] " Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b4a728e-bfa3-42a2-423d-e270e8993901@nvidia.com \
    --to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).