linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Karnik <deathdruid@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>,
	Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@kernel.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.10.0
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:14:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b64f7f05011308141a04b2c1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050113115154.GW10340@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 06:51:54 -0500, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 06:46:32AM -0500, Rahul Karnik wrote:
> > We are not talking about an application, but rather out of tree kernel
> > modules (or rather, different versions of modules already in the
> > tree).
> 
> For kernel modules you should never use /usr/include headers though.
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include headers should be used for them
> instead.

I was replying to the following:

> On Thursday 13 January 2005 09:42, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > I'm a distribution vendor. If x11 really required having current kernel
> > config at compile time to function properly, I'd start sending threats to
> > its authors.

"current kernel config" is the the same as /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/build/include, isn't it? I was saying that kernel modules
absolutely require the headers for the running kernel, just as you
are. Granted, the drm makefiles may be broken anyway and point to
/usr/include/linux.

Thanks,
Rahul

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-13 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-08 15:13 [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers 2.6.10.0 Mariusz Mazur
2005-01-10 15:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-01-12 10:49 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-12 11:11   ` Mariusz Mazur
2005-01-12 12:04     ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-13  8:13     ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-13  9:42       ` Mariusz Mazur
2005-01-13 11:00         ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-13 11:46           ` Rahul Karnik
2005-01-13 11:51             ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-01-13 16:14               ` Rahul Karnik [this message]
2005-01-13 16:29               ` Mariusz Mazur
2005-01-13 12:18             ` Andrew Walrond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b64f7f05011308141a04b2c1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=deathdruid@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@walrond.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmazur@kernel.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).