From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752921AbdHIKRq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:17:46 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45620 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752617AbdHIKRo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:17:44 -0400
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>,
        Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com>,
        Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@arm.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency
 switching
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
References: <1501857104-11279-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <1501857104-11279-19-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
 <20170809042825.GI28857@vireshk-i7>
 <0f89f543-39a9-30a5-4976-0c447f5fe843@arm.com>
 <20170809101301.GB29383@vireshk-i7>
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Organization: ARM
Message-ID: <5bb13d54-f07b-6ca3-c77a-d7bebcdfc770@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:17:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170809101301.GB29383@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 09/08/17 11:13, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-08-17, 11:09, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Firmware needs to serialize or override based on the timing of the two
>> consecutive requests.
> 
> Maybe add a comment over that routine and detail its working a bit? Like its not
> synchronous, etc. I expect that you would also add a callback with SCMI, so that
> the cpufreq driver is notified when frequency is changed ?
> 

OK, will do. Yes, I don't have firmware implementing notifications yet,
so waiting until I can test it.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep