From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6397AC47097 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 03:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED1A61402 for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 03:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229719AbhE2DFb (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 23:05:31 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:2342 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229547AbhE2DFa (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 23:05:30 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FsR8z6X7Gz19SZ2; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:59:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:03:52 +0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.177.72) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 29 May 2021 11:03:52 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tracing: fix spelling mistakes From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" To: Steven Rostedt CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel References: <20210525062047.8951-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210525062047.8951-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210528211314.5dba632a@oasis.local.home> <93006372-8482-84af-52c0-1d6e7f66e187@huawei.com> <20210528221113.4f66aaea@oasis.local.home> Message-ID: <5ce217e6-c768-f86a-44f1-3b924d838b45@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 11:03:51 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.72] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/5/29 10:40, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > On 2021/5/29 10:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Sat, 29 May 2021 10:01:31 +0800 >> "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" wrote: >> >>> On 2021/5/29 9:13, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>>> On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:20:47 +0800 >>>> Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: >>>>> wont ==> won't >>>> >>>> I prefer not to fix that spelling. I sometimes purposely leave off >>>> single quotes. It's no that big of a deal, and doesn't deserve the >>>> churn. >>> >>> Yes, all people can get it right by their wits. "Wont" doesn't affect >>> their reading speed. But most people might think it's best to add the >>> missing single quote. >>> >>> The minority obeys the majority? >> >> I really don't care. Thanks. >> In my opinion, it's unnecessary churn, that just >> adds noise to the git logs. > > git grep -wn wont | wc -l > 83 > > OK, I just did a search for "wont", and there are currently 83 places in > use. Language is not mathematics, there is no absolute right or wrong. If > a lot of people are using it incorrectly or specifically, then the new one > is also right. > > Wow, should I send v2 to remove "wont ==> won't"? Actually, I'd prefer to change it to "won't". > >> >> -- Steve >> >> . >>