Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/camellia - Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

[Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>]

Le 09/06/2022 à 12:15, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 09:32:53AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell,
>> especially when there are circular dependencies are involved.
>>
>> Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/crypto/camellia.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia.h b/arch/x86/crypto/camellia.h
>> index 1dcea79e8f8e..547fb7e30928 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/camellia.h
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>   
>>   #include <crypto/b128ops.h>
>>   #include <linux/crypto.h>
>> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>   
>>   #define CAMELLIA_MIN_KEY_SIZE	16
>>   #define CAMELLIA_MAX_KEY_SIZE	32
> 
> This is not sufficient.  For example, asmlinkage isn't explicitly
> defined by any of these header files so it would be relying on an
> implicit inclusion which is prone to breakage.

Agreed, I missed that.

> 
> Did you audit the entire file?

Yes, but I missed the asmlinkage.

In fact, I've sent a few "obvious" (but nothing is never obvious at the 
end...) patches like that to see the interest.

I've spotted a few .h file with "easy to check" content.
Mostly #define, function declarations, a few u<something> datatypes.

Then, I made the #include simplification and compile tested the change.

If it worked, I consider that the patch looks fine.


In this particular case, I guess that the 'asmlinkage' should come from 
another #include when "camellia.h" is used.

My goal was not to introduce some new hidden constraints related to the 
order of the included .h. I just wanted to make them explicit (and 
complete) and start to simplify things.


As said, nothing is never obvious, and I'll stay away from this kind of 
changes :)


Thanks a lot for the review.

CJ



> 
> Cheers,