From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753981AbcFPJpB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:45:01 -0400 Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:38471 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbcFPJo7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:44:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping To: David Miller References: <1466002730-58476-1-git-send-email-john@phrozen.org> <20160615.222050.2210130284846212716.davem@davemloft.net> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, keyhaede@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name From: John Crispin Message-ID: <5dbb935d-2d9a-48fe-79c7-8e8f57b27678@phrozen.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:44:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160615.222050.2210130284846212716.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/06/2016 07:20, David Miller wrote: > From: John Crispin > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:58:46 +0200 > >> This series contains 2 small code cleanups that are leftovers from the >> MIPS support. There is also a small fix that adds proper locking to the >> code accessing the IRQ registers. Without this fix we saw deadlocks caused >> by the last patch of the series, which adds IRQ grouping. The grouping >> feature allows us to use different IRQs for TX and RX. By doing so we can >> use affinity to let the SoC handle the IRQs on different cores. > > This patch series doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree, I get rejects > on patch #4. > it depends on the series with the 11 fixes that i sent last week which is however in the net tree and not the next tree (i also still had the DQL hack in my tree). if i resend this at the start of the next rc1 would you merge it into the net tree so that it becomes part of v4.8 ? John