From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, js1304@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/8] mm: Isolate coherent device memory nodes from HugeTLB allocation paths
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:17:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f9f43c1-115f-e3fe-fca2-37e6c1eed73f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d1ipawsm.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 25/10/16 15:15, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> writes:
>
>> On 10/23/2016 09:31 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> This change is part of the isolation requiring coherent device memory nodes
>>> implementation.
>>>
>>> Isolation seeking coherent device memory node requires allocation isolation
>>> from implicit memory allocations from user space. Towards that effect, the
>>> memory should not be used for generic HugeTLB page pool allocations. This
>>> modifies relevant functions to skip all coherent memory nodes present on
>>> the system during allocation, freeing and auditing for HugeTLB pages.
>>
>> This seems really fragile. You had to hit, what, 18 call sites? What
>> are the odds that this is going to stay working?
>
>
> I guess a better approach is to introduce new node_states entry such
> that we have one that excludes coherent device memory numa nodes. One
> possibility is to add N_SYSTEM_MEMORY and N_MEMORY.
>
> Current N_MEMORY becomes N_SYSTEM_MEMORY and N_MEMORY includes
> system and device/any other memory which is coherent.
>
I thought of this as well, but I would rather see N_COHERENT_MEMORY
as a flag. The idea being that some device memory is a part of
N_MEMORY, but N_COHERENT_MEMORY gives it additional attributes
> All the isolation can then be achieved based on the nodemask_t used for
> allocation. So for allocations we want to avoid from coherent device we
> use N_SYSTEM_MEMORY mask or a derivative of that and where we are ok to
> allocate from CDM with fallbacks we use N_MEMORY.
>
I suspect its going to be easier to exclude N_COHERENT_MEMORY.
> All nodes zonelist will have zones from the coherent device nodes but we
> will not end up allocating from coherent device node zone due to the
> node mask used.
>
>
> This will also make sure we end up allocating from the correct coherent
> device numa node in the presence of multiple of them based on the
> distance of the coherent device node from the current executing numa
> node.
>
The idea is good overall, but I think its going to be good to document
the exclusions with the flags
Balbir Singh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 4:31 [RFC 0/8] Define coherent device memory node Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 1/8] mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 17:09 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-25 1:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-25 15:47 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 2/8] mm: Add specialized fallback zonelist for coherent device memory nodes Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 17:10 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-25 1:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-11-17 7:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-11-17 7:59 ` [DRAFT 1/2] mm/cpuset: Exclude CDM nodes from each task's mems_allowed node mask Anshuman Khandual
2016-11-17 7:59 ` [DRAFT 2/2] mm/hugetlb: Restrict HugeTLB allocations only to the system RAM nodes Anshuman Khandual
2016-11-17 8:28 ` [DRAFT 1/2] mm/cpuset: Exclude CDM nodes from each task's mems_allowed node mask kbuild test robot
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 3/8] mm: Isolate coherent device memory nodes from HugeTLB allocation paths Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 17:16 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-25 4:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-25 7:17 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-10-25 7:25 ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 4/8] mm: Accommodate coherent device memory nodes in MPOL_BIND implementation Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 5/8] mm: Add new flag VM_CDM for coherent device memory Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 17:38 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-24 18:00 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-25 12:36 ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 19:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-25 20:01 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 6/8] mm: Make VM_CDM marked VMAs non migratable Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 7/8] mm: Add a new migration function migrate_virtual_range() Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [RFC 8/8] mm: Add N_COHERENT_DEVICE node type into node_states[] Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-25 7:22 ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-26 4:52 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 00/10] Test and debug patches for coherent device memory Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 01/10] dt-bindings: Add doc for ibm,hotplug-aperture Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 02/10] powerpc/mm: Create numa nodes for hotplug memory Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 03/10] powerpc/mm: Allow memory hotplug into a memory less node Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 04/10] mm: Enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on powerpc Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 05/10] powerpc/mm: Identify isolation seeking coherent memory nodes during boot Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 06/10] mm: Export definition of 'zone_names' array through mmzone.h Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 07/10] mm: Add debugfs interface to dump each node's zonelist information Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 08/10] powerpc: Enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for PPC64 platform Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 09/10] drivers: Add two drivers for coherent device memory tests Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 4:42 ` [DEBUG 10/10] test: Add a script to perform random VMA migrations across nodes Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-24 17:09 ` [RFC 0/8] Define coherent device memory node Jerome Glisse
2016-10-25 4:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-25 15:16 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-26 11:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-26 16:07 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-28 5:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-28 16:16 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-11-05 5:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-11-05 18:02 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-25 4:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-25 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-25 17:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-10-25 18:52 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-26 11:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-26 16:02 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-27 4:38 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-27 7:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-27 15:05 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-28 5:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-28 16:08 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-26 12:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2016-10-26 16:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-27 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 12:07 ` Balbir Singh
2016-10-25 15:21 ` Jerome Glisse
2016-10-24 18:04 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-24 18:32 ` David Nellans
2016-10-24 19:36 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f9f43c1-115f-e3fe-fca2-37e6c1eed73f@gmail.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).