From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B881BC433FE for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229784AbiJRIfg (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:35:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229926AbiJRIf2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:35:28 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F70A8F959 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id x31-20020a17090a38a200b0020d2afec803so13364677pjb.2 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:35:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wEe31S7OueGkq2ATsUWNgeMPrSgw0rLvjqo2xewOoPY=; b=n0omaL6hS21R8l/phMUF9jY6xR7fhPqREWjC2oG2B51o/rj2Mpu1tatt4o4PF2nd/K I2osJfdM7OmnocKcxnlwakiPoCFErGVROE4qb2PwzxMFKzSF+linGrJ+inqTc517Cgwl fUgR12cS5zQmS2MY2Kd+u0swoep4JLojQK39p61ouF1rwzU6Yfy/qOZvf5YMi4rIrUEF E5nryaZ0FWfVQbiQiLBwDpZLFzJCClDJepxouekIiYyV800JkHgLOlDf/uSlre4lKQB/ dE4Uec+qEyVeRa2yVV0Dk+vhs924cOIB2qtJ005eYcMs5AGpjcBfCZ8cs0QHc6CANqop eClA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wEe31S7OueGkq2ATsUWNgeMPrSgw0rLvjqo2xewOoPY=; b=YRc4CmSl/Kp0eJRtnZFAH6QP8gF2pPyi0E9Q42Bo+On5h3wSYtB5h0V0qka9Ottd87 WM+Dnv4ZqSMkoYOTbjwPBo1TU+dxzXhU5trM3RoVbkpUSJ1L/wPc6pjz9+Dgq2FJ3qZc rQNfjfBMSGLJ81Cn6lZm9QgGzhH+/5rHKGItijmllV0raqCzwEi2pEyjbI7vFdgCQGJ+ SxdTOjpiykL+ksdteiZQGneXmV9i8mIlbaXeRJJDVvkW8IsYjw4sVAhd2mmW/6d7IS0t SCTleiY60Oah/28euUQh2W0cwYyT/B6sgXAxwi6Ays/Tei0hECN5i+jLYcjb9sg8tVdh szXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf179ybPxJbUezjwvOd6mPmQdbCkAYUCg33DshHNAsEyuZlO6+bn tilQS4PNviz6sPtaY0SUgOU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4RxVuZxAP3xMNpqCjeZKVZLVRruTKutnEPI6ngJu2UocmJu9YAzfuDjOP4IgCEEMsD5s81ag== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3d85:b0:20c:8f6a:8298 with SMTP id pq5-20020a17090b3d8500b0020c8f6a8298mr38901757pjb.242.1666082123190; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs02-180-214-232-76.three.co.id. [180.214.232.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7-20020a621c07000000b005619afb745esm8613725pfc.113.2022.10.18.01.35.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <608e2363-1e51-7aef-746f-e93aac583a13@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:35:19 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Subject: Re: BISECT result: 6.0.0-RC kernels trigger Firefox snap bug with 6.0.0-rc3 through 6.0.0-rc7 Content-Language: en-US From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Phillip Lougher , regressions@leemhuis.info, mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcmiltenberger@gmail.com, regressions@lists.linux.dev, srw@sladewatkins.net References: <8702a833-e66c-e63a-bfc8-1007174c5b3d@leemhuis.info> <20221015205936.5735-1-phillip@squashfs.org.uk> <2d1ca80c-1023-9821-f401-43cff34cca86@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/22 16:45, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 10/16/22 19:21, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> >> No Verneed warnings so far. However, I need to test for a longer time >> (a day) to check if any warnings are reported. >> > > The regression still occurs with this patch applied. Let's see if > reverting the offending commit helps. > No regressions with the offending commit reverted. Now I have to try the proposed fix ([1]). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJMQK-hgQEkhgpO9VFOCgn-cKtVsr7Hb_58pAYiGoDi5SzGZtA@mail.gmail.com/ -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara