From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752506AbdBJKGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:06:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:33734 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752213AbdBJKGW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:06:22 -0500 Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the powerpc tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , KVM , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , PowerPC References: <20170210145943.5bf98310@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Nicholas Piggin , Michael Ellerman From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <60b17c77-fb90-20e7-8cc7-a5970d2e5691@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:06:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170210145943.5bf98310@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/02/2017 04:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/head-64.h > > between commit: > > 852e5da99d15 ("powerpc/64s: Tidy up after exception handler rework") > > from the powerpc tree and commit: > > 7ede531773ea ("KVM: PPC: Book3S: Move 64-bit KVM interrupt handler out from alt section") > > from the kvm tree. > > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S > > between commit: > > 1a6822d194c3 ("powerpc/64s: Use (start, size) rather than (start, end) for exception handlers") > > from the powerpc tree and commit: > > bc3551257af8 ("powerpc/64: Allow for relocation-on interrupts from guest to host") > > from the kvm tree. Michael, please pull the topic branch as soon as possible, so that the conflicts don't hit Linus. That said, the topic branch is a mess. It starts with generic arch patches (until "powerpc/64: Allow for relocation-on interrupts from guest to host") then it's only KVM, then on the top there's two more generic patches that were added _after_ Paul merged it. If possible, please pull only up to "powerpc/64: Allow for relocation-on interrupts from guest to host" and cherry-pick the top two patches ("powerpc/64: CONFIG_RELOCATABLE support for hmi interrupts" and "powerpc/powernv: Remove separate entry for OPAL real mode calls") into your next branch, but leave the rest for my tree only. Paolo