From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423163AbcFMT2Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:28:24 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:59532 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161215AbcFMT2W (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:28:22 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Boris Brezillon , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/48] clk: at91: replace usleep() by udelay() calls Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: <6120818.MyeJZ74hYa@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-22-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160613152409.GD3240@piout.net> References: <1465596231-21766-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <11395561.bQatt85IOg@wuerfel> <20160613152409.GD3240@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:E87krkG3ibFjZz8t0cX0J87+X+lAXPVR5JUnya6kL/rJqQtHSLi Kda9tEIOED8JvL1OknUxXRzJwkxQ8qpBi4s0j0htLY9TPiEXURa4er5iqFRdJ1n6Aygwg78 SDDoRiVpaQuxdl9l+++vNpnjIqMm6bOLm3wsDjr4KxEknFZwCj3WRHqPXLf4ODShA3VYLX3 hvmgK7hc97X0AIKrCiaWg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e1tdyUSThuA=:8Ia1HfLBZC68xMDQm8gwPc 3u1swaSez+WGYzRy0/MoGL8f3P/hhYi0e7QzkLpdlJE8k7LOAh6Y7/v9zH5U5a5l55wf9R+ip 9Ai/M+jt4dDqJAVMEW9YKYHfBrDLwgcnw/MEgFuhln1VYqk4WAAlQuD9uwBMsPs9TStZLtHvC WPNC5iVp4ICYZOTrQ9UQNi6I4pPiAkLjOvGRZZIiiWcGwGqMxi0sryNzFEDOR6Txr7LevfN9h sR2XQULtLlTP3eLWACtFHCf055YGD9GG1Qho3voV+aQ9cUyjg3rbFVSpbDbzTY67GxW2FqUiw d+XMzWDZLN+4jgUk5bupaIg7meZ1DTMyS82ulmUusObktA/679b01dvHPhrfhToMS7VJbsykT 7G4L84Gxr8yLhXaIT9FhxtNcT5Wgaeljizk/YqfSGgX9n7Rr3n8TbGp6XpIuk6IANvQXRtSv4 w7SBiRzGlPwxoXH+CtdI5ejq4X7gUMQylj3l4WARfU4Ce4RWN60TQgkm+AWsHZZeh0q/5GJEH rAuotyHVmU23PdZ2774GwzhXjtuAIImJvyRRrFvzgHmO1YNyXUdphry22qLo491PBzdiA4vr0 rOPNJt30p5H3EKm2Dp0wQtz/oMV5Mi2SNXMzM3QQWxARKXpOcaHLCle2/H06pRADBM750ksGr kZ8VCQn+VoLdqG1quGz2BKco6Pa86VkvjzH/TevgST24+ttwEhUN/61NAyhhLQTDN2I2l6HC5 UQrEOQKACIxsrxYc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 13, 2016 5:24:09 PM CEST Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 11/06/2016 at 00:30:36 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > > On Saturday, June 11, 2016 12:03:04 AM CEST Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > From: Cyrille Pitchen > > > > > > Fix the main and slow clock .prepare() implementations which used to call > > > usleep() when the scheduler wasn't ready yet. > > > > > > > Does this have to be called that early? It seems wasteful to always > > call udelay() here, when these are functions that are normally > > allowed to sleep. > > > > So I've tested it and something like that would work: > > if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) > udelay(osc->startup_usec); > else > usleep_range(osc->startup_usec, osc->startup_usec + 1); I think that's reasonable in this case. > But I'm afraid it would be the first driver to actually do something > like that (however, it is already the only driver trying to sleep). We have a lot of drivers that call potentially sleeping function from the .prepare callback, e.g. when they go to an i2c controller. Arnd