From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-zone kswapd process
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:38:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <619179322.1031870337@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D817BC8.785F5C44@digeo.com>
> Sorry, I don't buy that.
>
> a) It does not need to be architecture neutral.
>
> b) You surely need a way of communicating the discovered topology
> to userspace anyway.
>
> c) $EDITOR /etc/numa-layouf.conf
>
> d) $EDITOR /etc/kswapd.conf
I guess you could do that, but it seems overly complicated to me.
>> I think mbligh recently got the long-needed arch code in
>> for cpu to node... But I'm just not able to make the leap of faith that
>> memory detection is something that can ever comfortably be given to
>> userspace.
>
> A simple syscall which alows you to launch a kswapd instance against
> a group of zones on any group of CPUs provides complete generality
> and flexibility to userspace. And it is architecture neutral.
>
> If it really is incredibly hard to divine the topology from userspace
> then you need to fix that up. Provide the topology to userspace.
> Which has the added benefit of providing, umm, the topology to userspace ;)
Can we make a simple default of 1 per node, which is what 99%
of people want, and then make it more complicated later if people
complain? It's really pretty easy:
for (node = 0; node < numnodes; ++node) {
kswapd = kick_off_kswapd_for_node(node);
kswapd->cpus_allowed = node_to_cpus(node);
}
Or whatever the current cpus_allowed method is. All we seem to need
is node_to_cpus ... I can give that to you tommorow with no problem,
it's trivial.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-13 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-13 3:33 [PATCH] per-zone kswapd process Dave Hansen
2002-09-13 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-13 4:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-13 5:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
[not found] ` <3D8232DE.9090000@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <3D823702.8E29AB4F@digeo.com>
[not found] ` <3D8251D6.3060704@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <3D82566B.EB2939D5@digeo.com>
2002-09-13 22:52 ` [PATCH] per-zone^Wnode " Dave Hansen
2002-09-13 23:24 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-09-13 23:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-09-13 23:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-14 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-14 0:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-14 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-13 5:46 ` [PATCH] per-zone " Andrew Morton
2002-09-13 5:38 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-09-13 6:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-13 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-13 21:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 16:07 ` [PATCH] recognize MAP_LOCKED in mmap() call Hubertus Franke
2002-09-18 16:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-16 5:44 ` [PATCH] per-zone kswapd process Daniel Phillips
2002-09-16 7:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-16 15:12 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='619179322.1031870337@[10.10.2.3]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).