From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8033C34031 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9923424655 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="U8FaG0b0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727901AbgBSBNK (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:13:10 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:9710 "EHLO hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726757AbgBSBNK (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:13:10 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:11:58 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:13:09 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:13:09 -0800 Received: from [10.110.48.28] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:13:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/19] mm: Put readahead pages in cache earlier To: Matthew Wilcox CC: , , , , , , , , , References: <20200217184613.19668-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200217184613.19668-12-willy@infradead.org> <20200219010209.GI24185@bombadil.infradead.org> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <61bcaa87-91b2-857b-350a-86dab81a1f13@nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:13:08 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200219010209.GI24185@bombadil.infradead.org> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1582074718; bh=169bBczyyFHIG/Q8UwlECaKiABa8QJEvrDhzzb+cU00=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=U8FaG0b00obFZSv859L8oWEaaOcwQeUfDVqSWQFkBUZBOwH8vbuoD4N7mPb4ZFtWF 66/vGL4h4APgHKYjB8OgTdyZD1sLYo/MuGcyMep47kybExxzp1I/HCoaNBtiZxm2fS z+CWh0MSAuooR6vk29dw1BMTJOJvxutR9mbmjwbxN3WnaOY/L50yURHxsLJObLpMQU Ye+mwSNNOhmkQv3gZWRZzP6kLA76Kaff/6vAmGV/UaA/UAx4frrOHDuI7u/Oh55/eT 2fQWmlP0+bY+bGivsDqexntMqk58H3NzVgP/QqVhoTlnPJM3AeBJTvYVT4g9z/6mYr 7MuMCGqKPcA/Q== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/18/20 5:02 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:01:43PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: >> How about this instead? It uses the "for" loop fully and more naturally, >> and is easier to read. And it does the same thing: >> >> static inline struct page *readahead_page(struct readahead_control *rac) >> { >> struct page *page; >> >> if (!rac->_nr_pages) >> return NULL; >> >> page = xa_load(&rac->mapping->i_pages, rac->_start); >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page); >> rac->_batch_count = hpage_nr_pages(page); >> >> return page; >> } >> >> static inline struct page *readahead_next(struct readahead_control *rac) >> { >> rac->_nr_pages -= rac->_batch_count; >> rac->_start += rac->_batch_count; >> >> return readahead_page(rac); >> } >> >> #define readahead_for_each(rac, page) \ >> for (page = readahead_page(rac); page != NULL; \ >> page = readahead_page(rac)) > > I'm assuming you mean 'page = readahead_next(rac)' on that second line. Yep. :) > > If you keep reading all the way to the penultimate patch, it won't work > for iomap ... at least not in the same way. > OK, getting there... thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA