From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: introduce %dE for error constants
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:22:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61cd079f-d41b-75ec-9a1e-ef80f9d1f8fd@kleine-koenig.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190828125951.GA12653@jagdpanzerIV>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1878 bytes --]
On 8/28/19 2:59 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/28/19 14:49), Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 28/08/2019 14.02, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> On (08/28/19 14:54), Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>>> I personally think that this feature is not worth the code, data,
>>>>> and bikeshedding.
>>>>
>>>> The obvious alternative, I think already mentioned, is to just add
>>>> strerror() or similar as a function. I doubt there'd be much opposition
>>>> to that. Folks could use %s and strerr(ret). And a follow-up could add
>>>> the special format specifier if needed.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'd say that strerror() would be a better alternative
>>> to vsprintf() specifier. (if we decide to add such functionality).
>>
>> Please no. The .text footprint of the changes at the call sites to do
>> pr_err("...%s...", errcode(err)) instead of the current
>> pr_err("...%d...", err) would very soon dwarf whatever is necessary to
>> implement %pE or %dE.
Yeah, that's what I think, too. I cannot imagine a user of strerror()
who needs the string representation for something different than to feed
it to one of the family members of printk. That's also why I think that
the other already existing format specifier are a good idea.
It might not be the nicest part of the printk code, but this way it is
at least concentrated in one place only.
> New vsprintf() specifiers have some downsides as well. Should %dE
> accidentally (via backport) make it to the -stable kernel, which
> does not support %dE, and we are going to lose the actual error
> code value as well.
That is wrong. When you do
pr_err("There are no round tuits to give out: %dE\n", -ENOENT);
in a kernel that doesn't support %dE you get:
There are no round tuits to give out: -2E
That's a bit ugly but I can still work out what the original value was.
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 21:12 [PATCH v2] vsprintf: introduce %dE for error constants Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-27 21:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-27 21:22 ` Joe Perches
2019-08-27 21:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-27 23:10 ` Joe Perches
2019-08-28 11:32 ` Petr Mladek
2019-08-28 11:54 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-28 12:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-28 12:49 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-28 12:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-28 16:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2019-08-29 0:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-08-28 19:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-29 8:12 ` Petr Mladek
2019-08-29 8:27 ` Juergen Gross
2019-08-29 9:09 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29 17:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-30 9:06 ` Petr Mladek
2019-08-30 15:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-30 21:45 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-29 9:00 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-28 19:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-28 20:51 ` Mark Brown
2019-08-29 13:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61cd079f-d41b-75ec-9a1e-ef80f9d1f8fd@kleine-koenig.org \
--to=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).