From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11E6C54EED for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236101AbjA3LFz (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 06:05:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49892 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236321AbjA3LFQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 06:05:16 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B2633466 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:4bc7:2566:28bd:b73c]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pMRxX-00009o-UI; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:04:23 +0100 Message-ID: <62fb7c9a-179a-f3f0-93b6-5e74f88dad63@leemhuis.info> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:04:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list Subject: CIFS NTLM regression still annoying people (was: Re: Linux regressions report for mainline [2023-01-29]) Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Linus Torvalds Cc: LKML , Linux regressions mailing list , Ronnie Sahlberg , Steve French References: <167501403214.1314424.14370223374691112185@leemhuis.info> From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1675076665;76f21fbb; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pMRxX-00009o-UI Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29.01.23 20:32, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:42 AM Regzbot (on behalf of Thorsten > Leemhuis) wrote: >> >> * Andrew afaics didn’t sent a revert[1] from Vlastimir your way > Ok, I applied this one as tiny and clear and hitting actual user loads. Great, many thx! >> * A fix[1] for a stack_depot/kmemleak issue is in next for a while already too[2] > This one I left alone, since it's a bit more involved and the use-case > is more esoteric too. Totally fine with me and yeah, a bit esoteric. But when somebody bisects and report a problem (in this case: Boris) that already fixed in next for a few days, my mind yells "what a waste or energy, this could have been prevented by mainlining the fix a bit more quickly" -- that's why I brought it up. > And in other news, the input regression revert you mentioned earlier > got pulled this morning. Ahh, great. BTW, there is one thing that still bugs me: every few weeks there is yet somebody new[1] complaining about the removal of support for NTLM and weaker authentication algorithms from cifs some time ago in 76a3c92ec9e0. The situation[2] was improved slightly in 2f6f19c7aaad ("cifs: fix regression in very old smb1 mounts"), but it seems some users of Apple Time Capsules or some Epson printer/scanner still can't access their devices which apparently still work fine in Windows and macOS[1]. Yes, the issue is tricky, as there are security implications here and we have nobody that tests this, as you pointed out [3]. Is there nevertheless something somebody committed could do? Would we even be willing to add that support back in, in case someone commits to maintain and regularly test that codepath? Ciao, Thorsten [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216682 [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215375 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjSBvRk-ksUBOiQzJd=e19UZKvOSZs1UHahK5U0QVh6RQ@mail.gmail.com/