From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC8FC43461 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FEB613DF for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233840AbhENPlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 11:41:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50496 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231139AbhENPlI (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 11:41:08 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9E1AF35; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio_get To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zi Yan , Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton References: <20210511214735.1836149-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210511214735.1836149-8-willy@infradead.org> <88a265ab-9ecd-18b7-c150-517a5c2e5041@suse.cz> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <635649fa-dd98-c465-ffb4-7c0df9d4814e@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 17:39:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/14/21 4:24 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Nitpick: function names in subject should IMHO also end with (). But not a >> reason for resend all patches that don't... > > Hm, I thought it was preferred to not do that. Hm, no idea if there's a concensus on that, actually. > I can fix it > easily enough when I go through and add the R-b. If I was right...