From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263964AbTE0QtI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:49:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263967AbTE0QtI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:49:08 -0400 Received: from mail.intrusion.com ([12.148.143.187]:54474 "EHLO mail.intrusion.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263964AbTE0QtH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:49:07 -0400 Message-ID: <636A9B29EA94BC4194D844C27A3B1AAB03FC7D91@mercury.intrusion.com> From: "Corbett, David" To: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: sis900 802.1q VLAN Overlength Packets Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:02:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Does anybody know if the sis900 can be used with 802.1q VLANs, where the 4 bytes of tag information do not cause the driver to drop packets with (# of payload bytes) > 1496 ? I've searched the Internet and archives, but have found no definitive answer. I updated the sis900 driver from the 2.4.9-34 kernel to the one in the 2.4.20 kernel but I see no difference. I found information about allowing jumbo frames, but I am not sure if this is the best approach. If I need to ask this question elsewhere, please tell me.