archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <>
To: Sreekanth Reddy <>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <>
Cc: "" <>,,,,
	Sathya Prakash <>,
	Chaitra P B <>,
	Suganath Prabu Subramani  <>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <>,
	open list <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:47:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 4/21/2017 3:56 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> [Sreekanth] Whether same thing applicable for SPARC & POWER
> architectures. If yes then we are fine with this patch changes.

This behavior is common for all architectures according to this document.

Who would be the best person to comment on SPARC and POWER architectures
in specific? James and I exchanged some comments on the first version. 

James? can you comment on POWER behavior.

Inside of the Linux kernel, I/O should be done through the appropriate accessor
routines - such as inb() or writel() - which know how to make such accesses
appropriately sequential.  

"Whilst this, for the most part, renders the explicit
use of memory barriers unnecessary", 

there are a couple of situations where they might be needed:

 (1) On some systems, I/O stores are not strongly ordered across all CPUs, and
     so for _all_ general drivers locks should be used and mmiowb() must be
     issued prior to unlocking the critical section.

 (2) If the accessor functions are used to refer to an I/O memory window with
     relaxed memory access properties, then _mandatory_ memory barriers are
     required to enforce ordering.

Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-21 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-07 19:06 Sinan Kaya
2017-04-20  2:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-04-21  7:56   ` Sreekanth Reddy
2017-04-21 13:47     ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-04-21 15:10     ` Brian King
2017-04-24 22:32 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).