linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] soundwire: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:22:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63d7f3ed-b5a9-c869-5d25-a33a1d4e63c8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5296779.Sb9uPGUboI@kreacher>

Thanks Rafael. This looks mostly good but I have a doubt on the error
handling, see below.

> +static int sdw_acpi_check_duplicate(struct acpi_device *adev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct sdw_acpi_child_walk_data *cwd = data;
> +	struct sdw_bus *bus = cwd->bus;
> +	struct sdw_slave_id id;
> +
> +	if (adev == cwd->adev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &id))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (cwd->id.sdw_version != id.sdw_version || cwd->id.mfg_id != id.mfg_id ||
> +	    cwd->id.part_id != id.part_id || cwd->id.class_id != id.class_id)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (cwd->id.unique_id != id.unique_id) {
> +		dev_dbg(bus->dev,
> +			"Valid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
> +			cwd->id.unique_id, id.unique_id, cwd->id.mfg_id,
> +			cwd->id.part_id);
> +		cwd->ignore_unique_id = false;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_err(bus->dev,
> +		"Invalid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
> +		cwd->id.unique_id, id.unique_id, cwd->id.mfg_id, cwd->id.part_id);
> +	return -ENODEV;

if this error happens, I would guess it's reported ....

> +}
> +
> +static int sdw_acpi_find_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct sdw_bus *bus = data;
> +	struct sdw_acpi_child_walk_data cwd = {
> +		.bus = bus,
> +		.adev = adev,
> +		.ignore_unique_id = true,
> +	};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &cwd.id))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Brute-force O(N^2) search for duplicates. */
> +	ret = acpi_dev_for_each_child(ACPI_COMPANION(bus->dev),
> +				      sdw_acpi_check_duplicate, &cwd);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

... here, but I don't see this being propagated further...

> +
> +	if (cwd.ignore_unique_id)
> +		cwd.id.unique_id = SDW_IGNORED_UNIQUE_ID;
> +
> +	/* Ignore errors and continue. */
> +	sdw_slave_add(bus, &cwd.id, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev));
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * sdw_acpi_find_slaves() - Find Slave devices in Master ACPI node
>   * @bus: SDW bus instance
> @@ -135,8 +200,7 @@ static bool find_slave(struct sdw_bus *b
>   */
>  int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>  {
> -	struct acpi_device *adev, *parent;
> -	struct acpi_device *adev2, *parent2;
> +	struct acpi_device *parent;
>  
>  	parent = ACPI_COMPANION(bus->dev);
>  	if (!parent) {
> @@ -144,52 +208,7 @@ int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(adev, &parent->children, node) {
> -		struct sdw_slave_id id;
> -		struct sdw_slave_id id2;
> -		bool ignore_unique_id = true;
> -
> -		if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &id))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/* brute-force O(N^2) search for duplicates */
> -		parent2 = parent;
> -		list_for_each_entry(adev2, &parent2->children, node) {
> -
> -			if (adev == adev2)
> -				continue;
> -
> -			if (!find_slave(bus, adev2, &id2))
> -				continue;
> -
> -			if (id.sdw_version != id2.sdw_version ||
> -			    id.mfg_id != id2.mfg_id ||
> -			    id.part_id != id2.part_id ||
> -			    id.class_id != id2.class_id)
> -				continue;
> -
> -			if (id.unique_id != id2.unique_id) {
> -				dev_dbg(bus->dev,
> -					"Valid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
> -					id.unique_id, id2.unique_id, id.mfg_id, id.part_id);
> -				ignore_unique_id = false;
> -			} else {
> -				dev_err(bus->dev,
> -					"Invalid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
> -					id.unique_id, id2.unique_id, id.mfg_id, id.part_id);
> -				return -ENODEV;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
> -		if (ignore_unique_id)
> -			id.unique_id = SDW_IGNORED_UNIQUE_ID;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * don't error check for sdw_slave_add as we want to continue
> -		 * adding Slaves
> -		 */
> -		sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev));
> -	}
> +	acpi_dev_for_each_child(parent, sdw_acpi_find_one, bus);

... here?

It looks like a change in the error handling flow where
sdw_acpi_find_slaves() is now returning 0 (success) always?

Shouldn't the return of sdw_acpi_find_one() be trapped, e.g. with

return acpi_dev_for_each_child(parent, sdw_acpi_find_one, bus);

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 13:44 [PATCH v1 00/16] ACPI: Get rid of the list of children in struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 01/16] ACPI: glue: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:49 ` [PATCH v1 02/16] ACPI: glue: Introduce acpi_dev_has_children() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v1 03/16] ACPI: glue: Introduce acpi_find_child_by_adr() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v1 04/16] thunderbolt: ACPI: Use acpi_find_child_by_adr() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 15:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-10  6:46   ` Heikki Krogerus
2022-06-10 13:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:56 ` [PATCH v1 05/16] USB: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 15:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-10  6:47   ` Heikki Krogerus
2022-06-10 13:14     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:58 ` [PATCH v1 06/16] ACPI: container: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:29   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 15:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 13:59 ` [PATCH v1 07/16] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() for child lookup Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 14:02 ` [PATCH v1 08/16] ACPI: bus: Export acpi_dev_for_each_child() to modules Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 14:03 ` [PATCH v1 09/16] ACPI: video: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 14:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/16] ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/16] ACPI: scan: Walk ACPI device's children using driver core Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 14:09 ` [PATCH v1 12/16] platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:48   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 15:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 14:12 ` [PATCH v1 13/16] mfd: core: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 14:16 ` [PATCH v1 14/16] soundwire: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:22   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-06-09 16:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 16:21       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-09 17:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 19:08           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-09 14:18 ` [PATCH v1 15/16] ACPI / MMC: PM: Unify fixing up device power Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:33   ` Adrian Hunter
2022-06-10 12:16   ` Ulf Hansson
2022-06-09 14:19 ` [PATCH v1 16/16] ACPI: bus: Drop unused list heads from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-09 15:12 ` [PATCH v1 00/16] ACPI: Get rid of the list of children in " Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 20:24   ` Frank Rowand
2022-06-09 15:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-09 15:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:05   ` [PATCH v2 01/16] ACPI: glue: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:06   ` [PATCH v2 02/16] ACPI: glue: Introduce acpi_dev_has_children() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:10   ` [PATCH v2 03/16] ACPI: glue: Introduce acpi_find_child_by_adr() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:11   ` [PATCH v2 04/16] thunderbolt: ACPI: Replace tb_acpi_find_port() with acpi_find_child_by_adr() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:55     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-14  6:07     ` Mika Westerberg
2022-06-14 18:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-15  6:27         ` Mika Westerberg
2022-06-15 19:52           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-14  7:36     ` Heikki Krogerus
2022-06-13 18:15   ` [PATCH v2 06/16] ACPI: container: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:16   ` [PATCH v2 07/16] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() for child lookup Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:26   ` [PATCH v2 08/16] ACPI: bus: Export acpi_dev_for_each_child() to modules Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:26   ` [PATCH v2 09/16] ACPI: video: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:26   ` [PATCH v2 10/16] ACPI: bus: Introduce acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:27   ` [PATCH v2 11/16] ACPI: scan: Walk ACPI device's children using driver core Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:30   ` [PATCH v2 12/16] platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:54     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-13 20:50     ` Hans de Goede
2022-06-13 18:31   ` [PATCH v2 13/16] mfd: core: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-15 22:39     ` Lee Jones
2022-06-16 17:31       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-27 11:38     ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and ACPI due for the v5.20 merge window Lee Jones
2022-06-27 12:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:35   ` [PATCH v2 14/16] soundwire: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-23  8:10     ` Vinod Koul
2022-06-23 12:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-23 12:41         ` Vinod Koul
2022-06-23 13:26           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:36   ` [PATCH v2 15/16] ACPI / MMC: PM: Unify fixing up device power Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:38   ` [PATCH v2 16/16] ACPI: bus: Drop unused list heads from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:39   ` [PATCH v2 05/16] USB: ACPI: Replace usb_acpi_find_port() with acpi_find_child_by_adr() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-13 18:53     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-14  7:37     ` Heikki Krogerus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63d7f3ed-b5a9-c869-5d25-a33a1d4e63c8@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).