From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70098C4360C for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A604206B7 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726476AbfI0HRh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:17:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47764 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725804AbfI0HRh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:17:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E1B2114; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.30] (ovpn-12-30.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1A81000337; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: introduce mdev based hardware backend To: Tiwei Bie Cc: mst@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.daly@intel.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com References: <20190926045427.4973-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com> <1b4b8891-8c14-1c85-1d6a-2eed1c90bcde@redhat.com> <20190927045438.GA17152@___> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <64a1f619-138f-cd21-e996-84724935e4c8@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:17:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190927045438.GA17152@___> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.71]); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/9/27 下午12:54, Tiwei Bie wrote: >> The name could be confusing, get_queue_max() is to get the maximum number of >> entries for a virtqueue supported by this device. > OK. It might be better to rename it to something like: > > get_vq_num_max() > > which is more consistent with the set_vq_num(). > Yes, will do in next version. Thanks