From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264191AbUDGW1w (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:27:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261206AbUDGW1w (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:27:52 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:6583 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261197AbUDGW1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:27:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:39:17 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NUMA API for Linux Message-ID: <6560000.1081377557@flay> In-Reply-To: <20040408001629.2ff39598.ak@suse.de> References: <1081373058.9061.16.camel@arrakis><20040407145130.4b1bdf3e.akpm@osdl.org> <20040408001629.2ff39598.ak@suse.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> ppc64+CONFIG_NUMA compiles OK. > > ppc64 doesn't have the system calls hooked up, but I'm not sure how useful > it would be for these boxes anyways (afaik they are pretty uniform) They actually are fairly keen on doing NUMA for HPC stuff - it makes a significant performance improvement ... M.