From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756853Ab2EUNju (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 09:39:50 -0400 Received: from usindpps03.hds.com ([207.126.252.16]:34221 "EHLO usindpps03.hds.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754501Ab2EUNjt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 09:39:49 -0400 From: Satoru Moriya To: Richard Davies , Rik van Riel CC: KOSAKI Motohiro , Jerome Marchand , "jweiner@redhat.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "lwoodman@redhat.com" , "dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net" , Seiji Aguchi , Minchan Kim Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 09:39:29 -0400 Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0 Thread-Topic: [RFC][PATCH] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0 Thread-Index: Ac03IRZvfJRTsViRRWqmMuud96sxbwANcwEQ Message-ID: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9C015955EED7@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> References: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB951A45F@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> <20120424082019.GA18395@alpha.arachsys.com> <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9C014649EC4D@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> <20120426142643.GA18863@alpha.arachsys.com> <4FA82C11.2030805@redhat.com> <20120521071226.GJ29495@alpha.arachsys.com> In-Reply-To: <20120521071226.GJ29495@alpha.arachsys.com> Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: ja-JP, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1205210123 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Richard, On 05/21/2012 03:12 AM, Richard Davies wrote: > Now that 3.4 is out with Rik's fixes, I'm keen to start testing with > and without this extra patch. > > Satoru - should I just apply your original patch (most likely), or do > you need to update for the final released kernel? Thank you for testing! I believe you can apply the patch without any updates. Regards, Satoru