From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: make several AVIC callbacks optional
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:41:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65871234-0c94-2455-c55f-6c1d5775e485@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yg/ZZMAz7XZ6wn/u@google.com>
On 2/18/22 18:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> True, on the other hand there's no reason why a hypothetical third vendor
>> would have to support it. The call is conditional to apicv_active being
>> true.
> Ah, right, even if the the static_call_cond() is unnecessary because we want to
> make the hook mandatory if APICv is supported, APICv itself may not be supported.
I'm not even sure we want to make it mandatory, in fact.
Also new full log:
----
All their invocations are conditional on vcpu->arch.apicv_active,
meaning that they need not be implemented by vendor code: even
though at the moment both vendors implement APIC virtualization,
all of them should be optional. In fact SVM does not need many of
them, and their implementation can be deleted now.
----
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 18:08 [PATCH v3 0/6] kvm: x86: better handling of optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86: return 1 unconditionally for availability of KVM_CAP_VAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 13:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: use static_call_cond for optional callbacks Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: remove KVM_X86_OP_NULL and mark optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86: warn on incorrectly NULL members of kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: make several AVIC callbacks optional Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-17 17:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-17 22:30 ` David Laight
2022-03-18 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-18 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 17:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 23:03 ` David Laight
2022-03-20 13:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65871234-0c94-2455-c55f-6c1d5775e485@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).