From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759031AbYGJQlm (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:41:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756756AbYGJQlc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:41:32 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:31555 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753138AbYGJQlb (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:41:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=HaQd2lJXMd7/BtEP2J6WGRl+W3uNEzSo+Yb482KrHVXpm8Pq4a+lz3vhpsAypQfNi WTzVFV/gImvTxyh+9YSww== Message-ID: <6599ad830807100941k330bb62cg7ae6a3d611e2dffa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:41:06 -0700 From: "Paul Menage" To: "Vivek Goyal" Subject: Re: [RFC] How to handle the rules engine for cgroups Cc: "linux kernel mailing list" , "Libcg Devel Mailing List" , "Balbir Singh" , "Dhaval Giani" , "Peter Zijlstra" , kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, "Kazunaga Ikeno" , "Morton Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <20080710140624.GB3782@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080701191126.GA17376@redhat.com> <6599ad830807100207q26cf2416qb8d38d1d715b5ba0@mail.gmail.com> <20080710140624.GB3782@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > This looks interesting. So above method should solve atleast the > reliability issue of event transport to user space. Got few thougts. > > - Hopefully number of hiearchies will not explode as we will be > mounting one hierarchies per event type (uid change, gid change, > exec, maybe fork etc.). In what circumstances would you want to reclassify processes to a different cgroup on a fork? Paul