From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: daejun7.park@samsung.com, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:23:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <963815509.21594603681971.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:27 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> > > Bart - how do you want to proceed?
> >
> > Hi Avri and Daejun,
> >
> > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags
> > yet. I
> > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from
> > one or
> > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch
> > series.
> >
> > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed
> > reply.
>
> Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy.
>
> Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed-
> by tag?
>
> Thanks,
> Daejun
Hi Daejun
I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it
works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance
downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should
think about HPB 2.0.
Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined,
performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it
later.
BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are
conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my
tested-by tag.
Tested-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Thanks,
Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-13 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p8>
2020-07-02 23:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
[not found] ` <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p2>
2020-07-02 23:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
[not found] ` <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p6>
2020-07-02 23:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
[not found] ` <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p4>
2020-07-02 23:25 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-07-08 23:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-07-09 5:16 ` Avri Altman
2020-07-09 7:29 ` Daejun Park
2020-07-09 8:40 ` Avri Altman
2020-07-13 1:08 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p7>
2020-07-02 23:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-07-13 1:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-07-13 9:23 ` Bean Huo [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20200702231936epcms2p81557f83504ef1c1e81bfc81a0143a5b4@epcms2p5>
2020-07-02 23:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-07-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-07-13 0:04 ` Daejun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).