linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: Fully serialize gfn=>pfn cache refresh via mutex
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 18:01:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <667d0690-0391-1173-c65c-5b0316587553@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yoe5fkBzmnABpn2G@google.com>

On 5/20/22 17:53, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Does kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_unmap also need to take the mutex, to avoid the
>> WARN_ON(gpc->valid)?
> I don't know What WARN_ON() you're referring to, but there is a double-free bug
> if unmap() runs during an invalidation.  That can be solved without having to
> take the mutex though, just reset valid/pfn/khva before the retry.

I was thinking of this one:

	/*
	 * Other tasks must wait for _this_ refresh to complete before
	 * attempting to refresh.
	 */
	WARN_ON_ONCE(gpc->valid);

but unmap sets gpc->valid to false, not true. ಠ_ಠ

Still, as you point out unmap() and refresh() can easily clash.  In 
practice they probably exclude each other by different means (e.g. 
running in a single vCPU thread), but then in practice neither is a fast 
path.  It seems easier to just make them thread-safe the easy way now 
that there is a mutex.

> When searching to see how unmap() was used in the original series (there's no
> other user besides destroy...), I stumbled across this likely-related syzbot bug
> that unfortunately didn't Cc KVM:-(

To give an example, VMCLEAR would do an unmap() if the VMCS12 was mapped 
with a gfn-to-pfn cache.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 21:00 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: Fix mmu_notifier vs. pfncache vs. pfncache races Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] Revert "KVM: Do not speculatively mark pfn cache valid to "fix" race" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] Revert "KVM: Fix race between mmu_notifier invalidation and pfncache refresh" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: Drop unused @gpa param from gfn=>pfn cache's __release_gpc() helper Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: Put the extra pfn reference when reusing a pfn in the gpc cache Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: Do not incorporate page offset into gfn=>pfn cache user address Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: Fully serialize gfn=>pfn cache refresh via mutex Sean Christopherson
2022-05-20 15:24   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-20 15:53     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-20 16:01       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: Fix multiple races in gfn=>pfn cache refresh Sean Christopherson
2022-04-29 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: Do not pin pages tracked by gfn=>pfn caches Sean Christopherson
2022-05-20 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: Fix mmu_notifier vs. pfncache vs. pfncache races Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=667d0690-0391-1173-c65c-5b0316587553@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).